Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Survey of mentoring programs for KL2 scholars
Karin A Silet1, Pamela Asquith, Michael F Fleming
1Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Academic institutions show varied approaches to supporting new investigator mentoring. More research is needed to identify effective mentoring practices and guide resource allocation for research training.
Area of Science:
- Clinical and Translational Science
- Research Career Development
- Academic Medicine
Background:
- Effective mentoring is crucial for training new investigators in academic settings.
- Limited understanding exists regarding institutional support for mentoring practices.
- The Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Consortium provides a framework for training future researchers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the current state of mentoring practices for KL2 scholars within the CTSA Consortium.
- To identify variations and commonalities in institutional approaches to mentoring new investigators.
- To explore key components of effective mentoring relationships in translational research.
Main Methods:
- A national semistructured telephone interview survey was conducted.
- The survey included all 46 CTSA institutions funded through 2009.
- Interviews focused on mentor selection, expectation alignment, relationship assessment, and mentor training.
Main Results:
- Practices varied significantly across the 46 CTSA institutions.
- Few programs formally selected mentors (5) or used mentor contracts (14).
- Formal mentor evaluation (16), financial incentives (10), and training (13) were inconsistently implemented.
Conclusions:
- There is considerable variation in mentoring practices among CTSA institutions.
- A lack of consensus exists on "what works" for effective mentoring of new investigators.
- Empirical research is necessary to inform resource allocation for optimal mentoring support.
More Related Videos
09:55Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Case Studies
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Types of Surveys
Cross-Sectional Research