Hepatic transcriptomic responses to TCDD in dioxin-sensitive and dioxin-resistant rats during the onset of toxicity
Paul C Boutros1, Cindy Q Yao, John D Watson
1Informatics and Bio-computing Platform, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract:
The dioxin congener 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) causes a wide range of toxic effects in rodent species, all of which are mediated by a ligand-dependent transcription-factor, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR). The Han/Wistar (Kuopio) (H/W) strain shows exceptional resistance to many TCDD-induced toxicities; the LD₅₀ of > 9600 μg/kg for H/W rats is higher than for any other wild-type mammal known. We previously showed that this resistance primarily results from H/W rats expressing a variant AHR isoform that has a substantial portion of the AHR transactivation domain deleted. Despite this large deletion, H/W rats are not entirely refractory to the effects of TCDD; the variant AHR in these animals remains fully competent to up-regulate well-known dioxin-inducible genes. TCDD-sensitive (Long-Evans, L-E) and resistant (H/W) rats were treated with either corn-oil (with or without feed-restriction) or 100 μg/kg TCDD for either four or ten days. Hepatic transcriptional profiling was done using microarrays, and was validated by RT-PCR analysis of 41 genes. A core set of genes was altered in both strains at all time points tested, including CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, Nqo1, Aldh3a1, Tiparp, Exoc3, and Inmt. Outside this core, the strains differed significantly in the breadth of response: three-fold more genes were altered in L-E than H/W rats. At ten days almost all expressed genes were dysregulated in L-E rats, likely reflecting emerging toxic responses. Far fewer genes were affected by feed-restriction, suggesting that only a minority of the TCDD-induced changes are secondary to the wasting syndrome.
Insights
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) mediates dioxin toxicity. Resistant Han/Wistar rats have a variant AHR, yet still upregulate dioxin-inducible genes, differing in response breadth from sensitive Long-Evans rats.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology and Pharmacology
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
Background:
- 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) elicits toxic effects via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR).
- Han/Wistar (Kuopio) (H/W) rats exhibit remarkable resistance to TCDD toxicity, attributed to a variant AHR with a deleted transactivation domain.
- Despite resistance, H/W rats' variant AHR can still upregulate dioxin-inducible genes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the hepatic transcriptional responses to TCDD in TCDD-sensitive (Long-Evans, L-E) and resistant (H/W) rats.
- To investigate the breadth and core set of dioxin-inducible genes in different rat strains.
- To assess the impact of TCDD exposure duration and feed restriction on gene expression.
Main Methods:
- TCDD treatment (100 μg/kg) or corn-oil control for 4 or 10 days in L-E and H/W rats.
- Hepatic gene expression profiling using microarrays.
- Validation of microarray data via RT-PCR for 41 selected genes.
Main Results:
- A core set of genes (e.g., CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1) were consistently altered in both strains.
- L-E rats exhibited a significantly broader transcriptional response to TCDD compared to H/W rats (three-fold more genes altered).
- At 10 days, nearly all expressed genes were dysregulated in L-E rats, suggesting emerging toxicity; feed restriction had minimal impact.
Conclusions:
- The variant AHR in H/W rats, despite its deletion, retains functionality in upregulating key dioxin-responsive genes.
- Rat strain differences in AHR structure significantly influence the breadth of TCDD-induced transcriptional changes.
- TCDD-induced gene dysregulation in sensitive rats extends broadly, potentially reflecting systemic toxicity, and is largely independent of feed restriction.
Related Concept Videos
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...

