Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptual measures of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners across defined virtual acoustic scenes.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Static and moving minimum audible angle: Independent contributions of reverberation and position.

JASA express letters·2024
Same author

Sound field synthesis for psychoacoustic research: In situ evaluation of auralized sound pressure levela).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
Same author

Speech Intelligibility in Reverberation is Reduced During Self-Rotation.

Trends in hearing·2023
Same author

A Phenomenological Model Reproducing Temporal Response Characteristics of an Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber.

Trends in hearing·2022
Same author

A Scoping Review of Studies Comparing Outcomes for Children With Severe Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids to Children With Cochlear Implants.

Ear and hearing·2021
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Indications for temporal fine structure contribution to co-modulation masking release.

Robert H Pierzycki1, Bernhard U Seeber

  • 1MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom. rpierzycki@gmail.com

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|January 12, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Temporal fine structure (TFS) significantly contributes to co-modulation masking release (CMR). Even after vocoding, which removes TFS, co-modulation still aids sound detection, suggesting robust across-frequency processing.

More Related Videos

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia
10:05

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia

Published on: January 27, 2018

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
08:25

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Published on: May 19, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia
10:05

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia

Published on: January 27, 2018

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
08:25

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Published on: May 19, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal processing

Background:

  • Co-modulation masking release (CMR) is a phenomenon where auditory masking is reduced when the envelopes of a masker and a target sound are modulated in the same way.
  • Temporal fine structure (TFS) refers to the rapid fluctuations in a sound waveform that carry information about the sound's frequency and phase.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the specific contribution of temporal fine structure (TFS) information to co-modulation masking release (CMR).
  • To determine if CMR relies on across-frequency processing of temporal envelope cues, independent of TFS.

Main Methods:

  • Tone detection thresholds were measured using unprocessed and vocoded stimuli in the presence of modulated noise maskers.
  • Vocoding was used to replace the original TFS of the tone and masker with unrelated TFS.
  • Co-modulation masking release (CMR) was calculated by comparing thresholds in co-modulated versus anti-modulated masker conditions.

Main Results:

  • Unprocessed stimuli yielded a maximum CMR of 11 dB.
  • After vocoding, tone thresholds increased, and CMR was significantly reduced to approximately 4 dB, but remained.
  • The magnitude of CMR was comparable between sine and noise vocoders, indicating TFS is not essential for all CMR effects.

Conclusions:

  • Temporal fine structure (TFS) information contributes to across-channel CMR, as evidenced by the reduction in CMR after vocoding.
  • Co-modulation provides a benefit for sound detection even when TFS is absent, highlighting the robustness of across-frequency processing.
  • The findings suggest that co-modulation strategies may be beneficial for improving sound detection in cochlear-implant users.