Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic01:21

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

The correlation between a drug's dosage and its impact on a biological system is a cornerstone of pharmacology and toxicology. Conventional dose–response curves, which include graded and quantal relationships, are key to this understanding. Graded dose–response curves depict the spectrum of a biological reaction to different doses within an individual, indicating that as the drug dosage increases, so does the intensity of the response. On the other hand, quantal dose–response relationships...
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perfluorooctanoic acid and cancer incidence: an updated investigation of a cohort in the mid-Ohio Valley.

Environment international·2026
Same author

Source apportionment of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) personal exposures: findings from the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) study in rural Guatemala.

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology·2026
Same author

Effects of cooking with liquefied petroleum gas versus biomass on hemoglobin concentrations in pregnant women: a pre-specified exploratory analysis of the HAPIN trial.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Differential DNA methylation in blood as potential mediator of the association between ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease among a cognitively normal population-based cohort.

Molecular psychiatry·2026
Same author

Effects of a liquefied petroleum gas stove and fuel intervention and air pollution exposure on early childhood development: Findings from the household air pollution intervention network trial.

Environment international·2026
Same author

Claims-Identified Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders in Medicare.

JAMA health forum·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the &#947;-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
08:23

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Published on: December 25, 2021

Risk estimation with epidemiologic data when response attenuates at high-exposure levels.

Kyle Steenland1, Ryan Seals, Mitch Klein

  • 1Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. nsteenl@sph.emory.edu

Environmental Health Perspectives
|January 12, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Risk assessors should prefer linear exposure-response models for occupational studies. These models accurately estimate low-dose risks without over or underestimation, unlike transformed models.

More Related Videos

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the &#947;-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
08:23

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Published on: December 25, 2021

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Epidemiology
  • Occupational Health
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Occupational studies are crucial for environmental risk assessment.
  • Exposure-response relationships in these studies often attenuate at high exposures.
  • Transformed exposure models may inaccurately estimate low-dose risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify simple parametric models that effectively fit attenuating exposure-response data.
  • To compare the performance of various linear and log-linear relative risk (RR) models.
  • To evaluate risk estimation in the low-dose region.

Main Methods:

  • Examined log-linear and linear relative risk (RR) models.
  • Utilized cohort study data on breast cancer and ethylene oxide exposure.
  • Assessed model fit and low-dose exposure-response slopes.

Main Results:

  • Linear RR models demonstrated a better fit compared to log-linear models.
  • Various linear models (untransformed, log-transformed, square root-transformed, linear-exponential, two-piece linear) fit the data well.
  • Different models yielded significantly different low-dose risk estimates, with linear models underestimating and transformed models overestimating low-dose risks.

Conclusions:

  • Models with linear or near-linear low-dose exposure-response relationships are preferable for risk assessment.
  • These preferred models avoid reliance on a point of departure for extrapolation.
  • They offer greater interpretability and consistent low-dose risk estimation.