Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Urine Studies I: Urinalysis

Urine Studies I: Urinalysis

Urinalysis is a widely used diagnostic test that analyzes urine's physical, chemical, and microscopic characteristics. Healthcare providers use it to detect and monitor various health conditions, including renal disease, urinary tract infections (UTIs), diabetes, and metabolic or systemic disorders.Components of UrinalysisUrinalysis consists of three primary components: physical, chemical, and microscopic examination. Each provides unique insights into the urine sample and, by extension, the...

Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test

Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test

A urine culture and sensitivity test is a diagnostic procedure used to identify urinary tract bacterial infections and determine the most effective antibiotics for treatment. This test is generally preferred when a patient shows manifestations of a urinary tract infection, such as frequent or painful urination, cloudy or foul-smelling urine, or lower abdominal pain.Purpose of the TestThe primary goals of a urine culture and sensitivity test are to:Determine the specific bacteria causing the...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Empty can and drop arm tests for cuff rupture : Improved specificity after subacromial injection.

Acta orthopaedica Belgica·2016

Same author

Taekwondo training improves balance in volunteers over 40.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2013

Same author

Identification of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding who do not need immediate treatment.

The Netherlands journal of medicine·2011

Same author

The value of the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score, C reactive protein and lactate in predicting 28-day mortality of sepsis in a Dutch emergency department.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2011

Same author

Effectiveness of temozolomide for primary glioblastoma multiforme in routine clinical practice.

Journal of neuro-oncology·2009

Same author

Supervised exercise versus non-supervised exercise for reducing weight in obese adults.

The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness·2009

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing

Published on: May 8, 2021

Urine Test Strips: How reproducible are readings?

R A Winkens, P Leffers, C P Degenaar

Canadian Family Physician Medecin De Famille Canadien

|January 12, 2011

Summary

Visual and spectrophotometric analysis of urine reagent test strips showed moderate to good agreement between observers. However, reproducibility could be improved by enhancing test pad discoloration for more reliable diagnostic results.

Area of Science:

Clinical Chemistry
Diagnostic Accuracy
Urine Analysis

Background:

Urine reagent test strips are widely used for preliminary urinalysis.
Accurate interpretation of test strip results is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Variability in visual interpretation can affect diagnostic reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

To assess the interobserver and intra-observer agreement in the visual and spectrophotometric analysis of urine reagent test strips.
To identify factors influencing the reproducibility of test strip readings.
To propose methods for improving the accuracy of urinalysis.

Main Methods:

Ninety urine samples were analyzed using multiple reagent test strips.
Visual examination was performed by two independent observers.

More Related Videos

CRISPR-Cas-mediated Multianalyte Synthetic Urine Biomarker Test for Portable Diagnostics

CRISPR-Cas-mediated Multianalyte Synthetic Urine Biomarker Test for Portable Diagnostics

Published on: December 8, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing

Published on: May 8, 2021

CRISPR-Cas-mediated Multianalyte Synthetic Urine Biomarker Test for Portable Diagnostics

CRISPR-Cas-mediated Multianalyte Synthetic Urine Biomarker Test for Portable Diagnostics

Published on: December 8, 2023

Spectrophotometric analysis was conducted for objective measurement.

Interobserver and intra-observer agreement were quantified using Cohen's Kappa statistic.

Main Results:

Moderate to good agreement was observed between different observers (interobserver) and by the same observer at different times (intra-observer).
The calculated Cohen's Kappa values indicated agreement levels lower than anticipated for routine diagnostic tests.
Spectrophotometry provided a more objective measure but agreement with visual inspection requires further investigation.

Conclusions:

While visual and spectrophotometric methods show acceptable agreement, reproducibility challenges exist in routine urinalysis.
Enhancing the visual contrast or discoloration of reagent test pads may significantly improve the consistency and reliability of results.
Further research into standardized interpretation aids and improved test strip design is warranted.