Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Fabrication and evaluation of breast tissue equivalent phantoms for image quality assessment in ultrasound imaging.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2024

Same author

Ante-partum localisation of the placenta with radioactive isotope Indium (113mIN).

The Medical journal of Malaysia·2022

Same author

Leadership and mentoring in medical physics: The experience of a medical physics international mentoring program.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2020

Same author

CHARACTERISATION AND EVALUATION OF AL2O3:C-BASED OPTICALLY STIMULATED LUMINESCENT DOSEMETER SYSTEM FOR DIAGNOSTIC X-RAYS: PERSONAL AND IN VIVO DOSIMETRY.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2019

Same author

A comparative study of radiation doses between phantom and patients via CT angiography of the intra-/extra-cranial, pulmonary, and abdominal/pelvic arteries.

Radiological physics and technology·2019

Same author

Diagnostic Efficacy of Synthesized 2D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Multi-ethnic Malaysian Population.

Scientific reports·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

Publication ethics and scientific misconduct.

W C G Peh¹, K H Ng

¹Singapore Medical Journal, 2 College Road, Singapore 169850. wilfred.peh@gmail.com

Singapore Medical Journal

|January 12, 2011

Summary

Upholding ethical principles in research, peer review, and publication is crucial for maintaining reader trust and journal integrity. Adherence to ethical guidelines prevents scientific misconduct, ensuring reliable and trustworthy research dissemination.

Area of Science:

Medical Ethics
Scientific Publishing
Research Integrity

Background:

Maintaining reader trust and journal reputation necessitates adherence to ethical principles throughout the research and publication process.
Ethical conduct is paramount in studies involving humans, animals, medical records, and human tissues/organs, requiring appropriate approvals.
Respect for privacy, confidentiality, and the acquisition of necessary rights and permissions are fundamental ethical considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

To emphasize the critical importance of ethical principles in all aspects of the research, peer review, and publication lifecycle.
To outline the essential ethical requirements for studies involving human and animal subjects, as well as sensitive data.
To define common forms of scientific misconduct and the consequences for authors.

More Related Videos

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Published on: July 7, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Published on: July 7, 2023

Main Methods:

This abstract outlines ethical principles and guidelines for scientific research and publication.
It highlights the necessity of obtaining ethical approvals for studies involving human or animal subjects.
It defines scientific misconduct and potential editorial actions.

Main Results:

Ethical conduct and adherence to guidelines are essential for maintaining trust and reputation in scientific publishing.
Failure to comply with ethical standards can lead to scientific misconduct, including data falsification and plagiarism.
Journal editorial actions will be taken against detected misconduct.

Conclusions:

Strict adherence to ethical principles is non-negotiable for the integrity of scientific research and publication.
Respecting patient confidentiality, obtaining approvals, and avoiding misconduct are vital components of ethical research.
Upholding ethical standards ensures the credibility and reliability of published scientific work.