Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Comparative Analysis of Human Growth Hormone in Serum Using SPRi, Nano-SPRi and ELISA Assays
Published on: January 7, 2016
A comparison of different definitions of growth response in short prepubertal children treated with growth hormone
P Bang1, R Bjerknes, J Dahlgren
1Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. peter.bang@ki.se
Insights
Many children exhibit poor growth hormone (GH) response. Defining criteria for poor responders is crucial for effectively managing short stature in children treated with GH.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Growth Hormone Therapy
- Short Stature Management
Background:
- Defining poor growth response in children treated with growth hormone (GH) is a significant clinical challenge.
- Current management strategies lack standardized criteria for identifying inadequate response to GH therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess and evaluate various established criteria for defining poor growth response in children undergoing GH treatment.
- To analyze the efficacy of different response metrics across diverse pediatric short stature populations.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective multicenter study of 456 short, GH-treated, prepubertal children (Height SDS ≤-2).
- Included diverse etiologies: idiopathic GH deficiency (IGHD), idiopathic short stature (ISS), small for gestational age (SGA), organic GHD, Turner syndrome (TS), skeletal dysplasia, and others.
- Analyzed first-year height SDS gain, height velocity (HtV), and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I (IGF-I) SDS response.
Main Results:
- Median first-year height SDS gain was 0.65, with a height velocity of 8.67 cm/year.
- Nearly 50% of IGHD children met criteria for poor responders, with 28% showing <0.5 SDS gain and lower IGF-I SDS increases.
- Children with TS, skeletal dysplasia, or born SGA showed a higher proportion with <0.5 SDS gain.
Conclusions:
- A substantial number of children demonstrate a poor response to growth hormone therapy.
- Establishing clear criteria for poor responders is essential for optimizing short stature management in pediatric patients.
- Further research is needed to refine response definitions and improve treatment outcomes.
Background:
How to define poor growth response in the management of short growth hormone (GH)-treated children is controversial.
Aim:
Assess various criteria of poor response.
Subjects And Methods:
Short GH-treated prepubertal children [n = 456; height (Ht) SD score (SDS) ≤-2] with idiopathic GH deficiency (IGHD, n = 173), idiopathic short stature (ISS, n = 37), small for gestational age (SGA, n = 54), organic GHD (OGHD, n = 40), Turner syndrome (TS, n = 43), skeletal dysplasia (n = 15), other diseases (n = 46) or syndromes (n = 48) were evaluated in this retrospective multicenter study. Median age at GH start was 6.3 years and Ht SDS -3.2.
Results:
Median [25-75 percentile] first-year gain in Ht SDS was 0.65 (0.40-0.90) and height velocity (HtV) 8.67 (7.51-9.90) cm/year. Almost 50% of IGHD children fulfilled at least one criterion for poor responders. In 28% of IGHD children, Ht SDS gain was <0.5 and they had lower increases in median IGF-I SDS than those with Ht SDS >0.5. Only IGHD patients with peak stimulated growth hormone level <3 μg/l responded better than those with ISS. A higher proportion of children with TS, skeletal dysplasia or born SGA had Ht SDS gain <0.5.
Conclusion:
Many children respond poorly to GH therapy. Recommendations defining a criterion may help in managing short stature patients.
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Signs of Puberty
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
