Modulating the redox potential of the stable electron acceptor, Q(B), in mutagenized photosystem II reaction centers
1The Ohio State University Biophysics Program, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
Abstract:
One of the unique features of electron transfer processes in photosystem II (PSII) reaction centers (RC) is the exclusive transfer of electrons down only one of the two parallel cofactor branches. In contrast to the RC core polypeptides (psaA and psaB) of photosystem I (PSI), where electron transfer occurs down both parallel redox-active cofactor branches, there is greater protein-cofactor asymmetry between the PSII RC core polypeptides (D1 and D2). We have focused on the identification of protein-cofactor relationships that determine the branch along which primary charge separation occurs (P(680)(+)/pheophytin(-)(Pheo)). We have previously shown that mutagenesis of the strong hydrogen-bonding residue, D1-E130, to less polar residues (D1-E130Q,H,L) shifted the midpoint potential of the Pheo(D1)/Pheo(D1)(-) couple to more negative values, reducing the quantum yield of primary charge separation. We did not observe, however, electron transfer down the inactive branch in D1-E130 mutants. The protein residue corresponding to D1-E130 on the inactive branch is D2-Q129 which presumably has a reduced hydrogen-bonding interaction with Pheo(D2) relative to the D1-E130 residue with Pheo(D1). Analysis of the recent 2.9 Å cyanobacterial PSII crystal structure indicated, however, that the D2-Q129 residue was too distant from the Pheo(D2) headgroup to serve as a possible hydrogen bond donor and directly impact its midpoint potential as well as potentially determine the directionality of electron transfer. Our objective was to characterize the function of this highly conserved inactive branch residue by replacing it with a nonconservative leucine or a conservative histidine residue. Measurements of Chl fluorescence decay kinetics and thermoluminescence studies indicate that the mutagenesis of D2-Q129 decreases the redox gap between Q(A) and Q(B) due to a lowering of the redox potential of Q(B). The resulting increased yield of S(2)Q(B)(-) charge recombination in the D2-Q129 mutants leads to an increased susceptibility to photoinhibitory light presumably due to (3)P(680)-mediated oxidative damage. The results indicate that the D2-Q129 residue plays a critical role in stabilizing the charge-separated state in PSII and further documents the structural and functional asymmetry between the two cofactor branches in PSII.
More Related Videos
10:08High-Throughput Analysis of Non-Photochemical Quenching in Crops Using Pulse Amplitude Modulated Chlorophyll Fluorometry
Published on: July 6, 2022
10:20Evaluation of Photosynthetic Behaviors by Simultaneous Measurements of Leaf Reflectance and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Analyses
Published on: August 9, 2019
Related Concept Videos
The Photochemical Reaction Center
Photosystem II
The pigment molecules are arranged across two photosystem domains — the antenna complex and the reaction center. The main aim of the pigment molecules...
Electron Transport Chain: Complex III and IV
Photosystem I
Both these photosystems work in concert. An excited electron from PSII is relayed to PSI via an electron transport chain in the thylakoid membrane of the chloroplast, which is comprised of the carrier molecule plastoquinone, the dual-protein cytochrome complex, and plastocyanin. As electrons move between PSII and PSI, they lose energy and must be re-energized...
The Z-Scheme of Electron Transport in Photosynthesis
Anoxygenic Photosynthesis
