Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Reverse Yeast Two-hybrid System to Identify Mammalian Nuclear Receptor Residues that Interact with Ligands and/or Antagonists
Published on: November 15, 2013
Mechanism of cytochrome P450-3A inhibition by ketoconazole
David J Greenblatt1, Yanli Zhao, Karthik Venkatakrishnan
1Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Tufts University School of Medicine and Tufts Medical Center, 136 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA 02111, USA. dj.greenblatt@tufts.edu
Objectives:
Ketoconazole is extensively used as an index inhibitor of cytochrome P450-3A (CYP3A) activity in vitro and in vivo, but the mechanism of ketoconazole inhibition of CYP3A still is not clearly established.
Methods:
Inhibition of metabolite formation by ketoconazole (seven concentrations from 0.01 to 1.0 µm) was studied in human liver microsomes (n = 4) at six to seven substrate concentrations for triazolam, midazolam, and testosterone, and at two substrate concentrations for nifedipine.
Key Findings:
Analysis of multiple data points per liver sample based on a mixed competitive-noncompetitive model yielded mean inhibition constant K(i) values in the range of 0.011 to 0.045 µm. Ketoconazole IC50 increased at higher substrate concentrations, thereby excluding pure noncompetitive inhibition. For triazolam, testosterone, and midazolam α-hydroxylation, mean values of α (indicating the 'mix' of competitive and noncompetitive inhibition) ranged from 2.1 to 6.3. However, inhibition of midazolam 4-hydroxylation was consistent with a competitive process. Determination of K(i) and α based on the relation between 50% inhibitory concentration values and substrate concentration yielded similar values. Pre-incubation of ketoconazole with microsomes before addition of substrate did not enhance inhibition, whereas inhibition by troleandomycin was significantly enhanced by pre-incubation.
Conclusions:
Ketoconazole inhibition of triazolam α- and 4-hydroxylation, midazolam α-hydroxylation, testosterone 6β-hydroxylation, and nifedipine oxidation appeared to be a mixed competitive-noncompetitive process, with the noncompetitive component being dominant but not exclusive. Quantitative estimates of K(i) were in the low nanomolar range for all four substrates.
More Related Videos
14:57Spectrophotometric Screening for Potential Inhibitors of Cytosolic Glutathione S-Transferases
Published on: October 10, 2020
10:33Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
Published on: October 26, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics: Drug–Drug Interactions
The Electron Transport Chain
Inhibitors of the electron transport chain
Rotenone, a widely used pesticide, prevents electron transfer from Fe-S cluster to ubiquinone or Q in...
Pharmacogenetics of Phase I Enzymes: Cytochrome P450 Isozymes
Enzyme Inhibition
Protein-Drug Binding: Mechanism and Kinetics
Various forces drive these interactions, including hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, ionic bonds, electrostatic interactions, and van der Waals forces. These bonds enable drugs to bind to specific sites on proteins,...
Inhibition of Cdk Activity