Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Soil microbiome prediction using traditional machine learning and deep learning models.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Correction: Assessing the emergence time of SARS-CoV-2 zoonotic spillover.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Similarity-based transfer learning with deep learning networks for accurate CRISPR-Cas9 off-target prediction.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Towards an interpretable machine learning model for predicting antimicrobial resistance.

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance·2025
Same author

Quantifying antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals in North America.

Frontiers in microbiology·2025
Same author

Assessing the emergence time of SARS-CoV-2 zoonotic spillover.

PloS one·2024
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes
09:44

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes

Published on: March 3, 2015

Systematic error detection in experimental high-throughput screening.

Plamen Dragiev1, Robert Nadon, Vladimir Makarenkov

  • 1Département d'informatique, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal (QC) H3C 3P8, Canada.

BMC Bioinformatics
|January 21, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic error in high-throughput screening (HTS) can impact drug discovery. Statistical tests, like the t-test, should assess error presence before correction to improve hit selection quality.

More Related Videos

Multi-enzyme Screening Using a High-throughput Genetic Enzyme Screening System
08:10

Multi-enzyme Screening Using a High-throughput Genetic Enzyme Screening System

Published on: August 8, 2016

A Simple Method for High Throughput Chemical Screening in Caenorhabditis Elegans
08:49

A Simple Method for High Throughput Chemical Screening in Caenorhabditis Elegans

Published on: March 20, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes
09:44

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes

Published on: March 3, 2015

Multi-enzyme Screening Using a High-throughput Genetic Enzyme Screening System
08:10

Multi-enzyme Screening Using a High-throughput Genetic Enzyme Screening System

Published on: August 8, 2016

A Simple Method for High Throughput Chemical Screening in Caenorhabditis Elegans
08:49

A Simple Method for High Throughput Chemical Screening in Caenorhabditis Elegans

Published on: March 20, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology and Drug Discovery
  • Biotechnology
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • High-throughput screening (HTS) identifies potential drug candidates by measuring compound activity.
  • Systematic errors in HTS assays can arise from technical, procedural, or environmental factors, potentially compromising hit selection.
  • Existing error correction methods may introduce bias into datasets without systematic error.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate statistical procedures for assessing the presence of systematic error in experimental HTS data.
  • To determine the most reliable method for identifying systematic error before applying correction techniques.
  • To enhance the accuracy of hit selection in drug discovery by ensuring appropriate error handling.

Main Methods:

  • Three statistical tests were evaluated: the chi-squared goodness-of-fit test, Student's t-test, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
  • These tests were applied to raw HTS measurements and estimated hit distribution surfaces.
  • The Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) method preceded the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for error assessment.

Main Results:

  • The study compared the accuracy of the three statistical procedures across simulated and real HTS datasets with varying systematic errors.
  • Performance analysis was conducted under diverse error conditions to identify the most robust assessment method.
  • The results indicate that appropriate statistical methodology is crucial for accurate systematic error assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers should utilize the t-test to statistically validate the presence of systematic error in HTS data.
  • Performing this assessment prior to applying error correction methods is essential.
  • Implementing this pre-correction statistical validation significantly improves the quality and reliability of selected drug candidates.