Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

The legal guidelines for nursing documentation are essential for ensuring accurate, professional, and ethical recording of patient care. The guidelines are discussed here:

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

Quality documentation and reporting share essential characteristics that ensure they are practical and valuable resources for those who use them. These characteristics are:
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Diagnostic safety in the policy landscape - a comparative policy document analysis of Australian and Aotearoa New Zealand vs US health care and research policy.

BMC health services research·2025

Same author

Diagnosis and Management of Tinea Infections.

American family physician·2025

Same author

Foreword: addressing diagnostic error: the first 10 years.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2025

Same author

Pellegrino and Thomasma's Anatomy of Clinical Judgments Revisited.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2025

Same author

The importance of cognition for improving diagnostic safety: Salerno redux?

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2025

Same author

The Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine's legacy: building a foundation for diagnostic excellence.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics

Published on: June 17, 2022

Checklists to reduce diagnostic errors.

John W Ely¹, Mark L Graber, Pat Croskerry

¹Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA. john-ely@uiowa.edu

Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges

|January 21, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Checklists can help prevent diagnostic errors caused by cognitive biases in physicians. This study proposes three types of checklists to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce medical errors.

More Related Videos

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative

Published on: August 21, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics

Published on: June 17, 2022

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative

Published on: August 21, 2021

Area of Science:

Medical error research
Cognitive science in medicine
Clinical decision-making

Background:

Diagnostic errors are frequent and linked to physicians' cognitive biases and heuristics.
While the causes of faulty thinking are known, prevention strategies are less understood.
High-reliability professions use checklists to mitigate errors; this concept is now emerging in medicine.

Purpose of the Study:

To extend the use of checklists to the diagnostic process.
To propose and describe three novel checklist types for diagnosis.
To advocate for further research and refinement of diagnostic checklists.

Main Methods:

Development of three distinct checklist types: general cognitive approach, differential diagnosis, and common pitfalls/forcing functions.
Informal development process without initial rigorous evaluation.
Conceptual extension of checklist utility from procedural to diagnostic tasks.

Main Results:

The proposed checklists aim to optimize cognitive approaches and prevent common diagnostic errors.
Checklists offer an alternative to intuition and memory in complex diagnostic reasoning.
Addresses the challenge of sense-making under uncertainty and time constraints.

Conclusions:

Checklists represent a promising strategy to enhance diagnostic accuracy.
Further investigation and rigorous evaluation of these diagnostic checklists are warranted.
Checklists can serve as a crucial tool in mitigating cognitive biases in medical diagnosis.