Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

A Zebrafish Model of Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Memory
Published on: February 28, 2013
Myths in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: an alternative viewpoint based on randomized controlled trials
Matthew T Wade1, Joseph P Rindone
1Clinical Pharmacy Section, Northern Arizona VA Health Care System, 500 N Hwy 89, Prescott, Arizona 86313.
Abstract:
Numerous randomized control trials (RCTs) have now questioned the effectiveness and safety of several therapeutic interventions in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Those RCTs that address several therapeutic interventions in T2DM were reviewed. Meta-analysis and ad hoc analysis were excluded. The data from those trials involving self-monitoring of blood glucose, treating hyperglycemia, lowering triglycerides, aggressive treatment of hypertension, and antiplatelet therapy with aspirin are presented with emphasis on hard end points. The evidence shows that self-monitoring of blood glucose, lowering blood glucose, reducing triglycerides, aggressive treatment of hypertension, and aspirin therapy are of questionable value in T2DM and may cause harm. Based on RCTs, most therapies in the treatment of T2DM are of questionable value. The medical community should reassess the usefulness of these therapies, which have become commonplace in the management of this condition.
Insights
Randomized trials question common type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treatments. Self-monitoring, glucose control, triglyceride reduction, aggressive hypertension management, and aspirin therapy show questionable benefits and potential harm.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management involves numerous interventions.
- Recent randomized control trials (RCTs) raise concerns about the efficacy and safety of these therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review RCT evidence on common T2DM therapeutic interventions.
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these treatments based on hard endpoints.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of RCTs, excluding meta-analyses and ad hoc analyses.
- Focused on trials concerning self-monitoring of blood glucose, hyperglycemia treatment, triglyceride reduction, aggressive hypertension management, and aspirin therapy.
Main Results:
- Evidence suggests self-monitoring of blood glucose offers questionable value in T2DM.
- Lowering blood glucose, reducing triglycerides, aggressive hypertension treatment, and aspirin therapy demonstrate questionable benefits and potential harm.
- Most T2DM therapies reviewed show questionable value based on RCT data.
Conclusions:
- Current common therapies for T2DM, including glucose control and aspirin, may not be beneficial and could be harmful.
- The medical community needs to re-evaluate the clinical utility of widely used T2DM management strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Type II Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Type II Diabetes I: Introduction
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Carbohydrate Metabolism
Starch accounts for approximately 60% of the carbohydrates consumed by humans. Since amylase enzymes cannot function in the stomach's acidic environment, starch can only be digested in the mouth and small intestine. Simple sugars are found naturally in milk and fruits in the...