Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Area Problem

Area Problem

Determining the area of a region with straight edges is straightforward, as geometric formulas for rectangles, triangles, and polygons can be applied directly. However, traditional geometric methods are insufficient when a region has a curved boundary, such as the area under a function.fromThe area problem involves finding a systematic way to measure such regions. One approach to solving this problem is through approximation. Instead of attempting to compute the area exactly at the outset, the...

Simpson's Rule I

Simpson's Rule I

Simpson’s Rule is a numerical integration method used to approximate the value of a definite integral when an exact antiderivative is difficult or impossible to obtain. The method estimates area by fitting a unique parabola through three equally spaced points on a curve and then integrating the resulting quadratic function over the interval. By using only a small number of sampled values, Simpson’s Rule provides an accurate approximation for many smoothly varying functions.A common practical...

Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area

Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area

For solids whose cross-sectional areas vary in a predictable way, volume can be determined by integrating these areas along an axis perpendicular to the slices. This approach is particularly useful for polyhedral solids, where classical geometric formulas may not be immediately applicable. A tetrahedron provides a clear example of how cross-sectional integration can be applied to a three-dimensional object with continuously changing geometry.Consider a tetrahedron with height h and a base that...

Speciation Rates

Speciation Rates

Speciation can proceed at markedly different rates, and evolutionary biologists commonly describe these differences through the models of gradualism and punctuated equilibrium. Both patterns explain how new species arise, but they differ in the tempo and continuity of evolutionary change. In both cases, evolutionary change arises from heritable variation within populations, with natural selection often shaping traits that improve survival and reproduction under specific environmental conditions.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Vertebral shape and spinal osteoarthritis in humans: A 3D analysis.

Anthropologischer Anzeiger; Bericht uber die biologisch-anthropologische Literatur·2026

Same author

Use it or lose it: A model-based assessment of the hypothesis that European Neanderthals relied on wildfires to create their campfires.

Open research Europe·2026

Same author

Technological complexity and combinatorial invention in small-scale societies.

Science advances·2025

Same author

A test of the Archaic <i>Homo</i> Introgression Hypothesis for the Chiari malformation type I.

Evolution, medicine, and public health·2025

Same author

Novel <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> MAPS vaccine combining O polysaccharides and pathogen-specific proteins.

mBio·2025

Same author

Editorial: Insights in: evolutionary psychology 2022.

Frontiers in psychology·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

Estimating surface area in early hominins.

Alan Cross¹, Mark Collard

¹Laboratory of Human Evolutionary Studies, Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. agc6@sfu.ca

|January 21, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Estimating body surface area in early hominins using height and weight is unreliable due to differing limb proportions. New methods are needed to accurately assess thermoregulation

More Related Videos

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum

Published on: March 19, 2017

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum

Published on: March 19, 2017

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

Area of Science:

Paleoanthropology
Human Evolution
Thermoregulation

Background:

Traditional height and weight-based methods are standard for estimating body surface area.
These methods are crucial for understanding thermoregulation's role in human evolution.
Limb proportions in early hominins differ significantly from modern humans, potentially affecting surface area estimations.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the reliability of standard height and weight-based methods for estimating body surface area in early hominins.
To compare these estimates with those from a method sensitive to proportional differences.
To investigate the impact of differing limb proportions on surface area calculations.

Main Methods:

Compared surface area estimates from a standard height/weight method with a proportion-sensitive method.
Applied both methods to taxa with human-like and distinct limb proportions.
Analyzed the contribution of limb proportion differences to discrepancies in estimates.

Main Results:

Both methods produced similar estimates for taxa with human-like proportions.
Significantly different estimates were obtained for taxa with divergent limb proportions.
Limb proportion differences were identified as the primary cause of estimation discrepancies.

Conclusions:

Standard height and weight-based body surface area estimations may be unreliable for early hominins.
Hypotheses on thermoregulation in human evolution based on these methods require reassessment.
Future studies on fossil hominin body surface area should employ methods accounting for proportional variations.