Related Experiment Videos
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease
Shah Ebrahim1, Fiona Taylor, Kirsten Ward
1Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK, WC1E 7HT.
Insights
Multiple risk factor interventions using counseling and education do not reduce mortality in general populations. However, these interventions may be effective for high-risk hypertensive and diabetic individuals, though evidence shows modest risk factor declines with significant heterogeneity.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular disease prevention
- Public health interventions
- Evidence-based medicine
Background:
- Counseling and educational interventions for multiple risk factors were assumed effective for reducing coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality and morbidity.
- Recent trials have questioned the effectiveness of these interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of multiple risk factor interventions on total mortality, CHD events, and cardiovascular risk factors in adults without pre-existing CHD.
- To evaluate the efficacy of lifestyle modification programs in diverse adult populations.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of 55 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with over 163,000 participants.
- Searches included CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases up to June 2006.
- Data extraction focused on mortality, clinical events, and changes in blood pressure, cholesterol, and smoking prevalence.
Main Results:
- Overall, interventions showed no significant reduction in total or CHD mortality (OR 1.00 and 0.99, respectively).
- Significant benefits were observed in high-risk hypertensive and diabetic populations for total mortality (OR 0.78) and cardiovascular events (OR 0.71).
- Modest reductions were found in systolic/diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol, and smoking prevalence, with marked unexplained heterogeneity across trials.
Conclusions:
- Behavior change interventions using counseling and education are not effective for reducing total or CHD mortality in general populations.
- These interventions may be beneficial for reducing mortality in hypertensive and diabetic individuals.
- The validity of pooled estimates is questionable due to significant unexplained heterogeneity, suggesting limited utility for broad health promotion.
Background:
Multiple risk factor interventions using counselling and educational methods assumed to be efficacious and cost-effective in reducing coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality and morbidity and that they should be expanded. Trials examining risk factor changes have cast doubt on the effectiveness of these interventions.
Objectives:
To assess the effects of multiple risk factor interventions for reducing total mortality, fatal and non-fatal events from CHD and cardiovascular risk factors among adults assumed to be without prior clinical evidence CHD..
Search Strategy:
We updated the original search BY SEARCHING CENTRAL (2006, Issue 2), MEDLINE (2000 to June 2006) and EMBASE (1998 to June 2006), and checking bibliographies.
Selection Criteria:
Randomised controlled trials of more than six months duration using counselling or education to modify more than one cardiovascular risk factor in adults from general populations, occupational groups or specific risk factors (i.e. diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, obesity).
Data Collection And Analysis:
Two authors extracted data independently. We expressed categorical variables as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where studies published subsequent follow-up data on mortality and event rates, we updated these data.
Main Results:
We found 55 trials (163,471 participants) with a median duration of 12 month follow up. Fourteen trials (139,256 participants) with reported clinical event endpoints, the pooled ORs for total and CHD mortality were 1.00 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.05) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.07), respectively. Total mortality and combined fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events showed benefits from intervention when confined to trials involving people with hypertension (16 trials) and diabetes (5 trials): OR 0.78 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.89) and OR 0.71 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.83), respectively. Net changes (weighted mean differences) in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (53 trials) and blood cholesterol (50 trials) were -2.71 mmHg (95% CI -3.49 to -1.93), -2.13 mmHg (95% CI -2.67 to -1.58 ) and -0.24 mmol/l (95% CI -0.32 to -0.16), respectively. The OR for reduction in smoking prevalence (20 trials) was 0.87 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.00). Marked heterogeneity (I(2) > 85%) for all risk factor analyses was not explained by co-morbidities, allocation concealment, use of antihypertensive or cholesterol-lowering drugs, or by age of trial.
Authors' Conclusions:
Interventions using counselling and education aimed at behaviour change do not reduce total or CHD mortality or clinical events in general populations but may be effective in reducing mortality in high-risk hypertensive and diabetic populations. Risk factor declines were modest but owing to marked unexplained heterogeneity between trials, the pooled estimates are of dubious validity. Evidence suggests that health promotion interventions have limited use in general populations.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Preventive Healthcare Services