Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

07:45
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
The Twin Peg Oxford partial knee replacement: the first 100 cases
Stephen H White1, Sharon Roberts, Peter W Jones
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust, Oswestry, Shropshire. SY10 7AG, United Kingdom. Georgi.Norris@rjah.nhs.uk
The Knee
|January 22, 2011
Summary
The Twin Peg Oxford partial knee replacement demonstrates excellent clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction at two years. This innovative implant shows no revisions or loosening, offering a secure alternative for knee arthroplasty.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomedical engineering
- Knee biomechanics
Background:
- Partial knee replacement offers a less invasive alternative to total knee arthroplasty.
- Femoral loosening and limited deep flexion contact are potential concerns with existing partial knee implants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the Twin Peg Oxford partial knee replacement.
- To assess the implant's efficacy in deep flexion and fixation security.
Main Methods:
- Clinical results of 100 patients undergoing medial unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Twin Peg Oxford implant were analyzed.
- Outcome measures included the Oxford Knee Score, American Knee Society Scores, range of motion, and patient satisfaction.
- Radiological assessment for loosening and loosening indicators was performed at 2 years post-surgery.
Main Results:
- Mean Oxford Knee Score of 41, American Knee Society Objective Score of 93, and Functional Score of 84 were reported.
- Mean range of motion reached 130°, with high patient satisfaction.
- No deaths, infections, dislocations, fractures, revisions, or pathological radiolucencies indicating loosening were observed.
Conclusions:
- The Twin Peg Oxford partial knee replacement demonstrates excellent 2-year clinical and radiological results.
- The implant provides secure fixation and improved femoral contact in deep flexion.
- It represents a promising alternative for surgeons seeking to mitigate risks associated with single-peg designs.
