Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Purification and Refolding to Amyloid Fibrils of (His)6-tagged Recombinant Shadoo Protein Expressed as Inclusion Bodies in E. coli
Published on: December 19, 2015
Conserved stress-protective activity between prion protein and Shadoo
Vignesh Sakthivelu1, Ralf P Seidel, Konstanze F Winklhofer
1Neurobiochemistry, Adolf-Butenandt-Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, D-80336 Munich, Germany.
Shadoo (Sho) and cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) share stress-protective functions, particularly involving their N-terminal domains. Both proteins utilize similar pathways to shield cells from excitotoxicity and other physiological stressors.
Area of Science:
- Neurobiology
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular Stress Response
Background:
- Shadoo (Sho) is a neuronally expressed glycoprotein with an unknown function.
- Sho shares structural similarities with the cellular prion protein (PrP(C)), including a hydrophobic domain (HD) and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor.
- Previous research indicated Sho can mitigate the toxicity of a PrP mutant lacking the HD (PrPΔHD).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the stress-protective activity of Sho and identify its functional domains.
- To compare the functional roles of Sho and PrP(C) in cellular stress protection.
- To explore the potential for functional replacement between the N-terminal domains of Sho and PrP(C).
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of Sho and PrP(C) protein domains (N-terminal, HD) in stress protection assays.
- Assessment of cellular protection against excitotoxicity (e.g., glutamate) and other physiological stressors.
- Investigation of protein homodimerization mediated by the HD.
- Functional domain-swapping experiments between Sho and PrP(C) N-termini.
Main Results:
- Sho, like PrP(C), protects cells against physiological stressors such as glutamate.
- The N-terminal domain of both Sho and PrP(C) is crucial for their stress-protective activity; deletions (ShoΔN, PrPΔN) significantly impaired this function.
- The HD promotes homodimer formation in both proteins, but domain deletions had differential effects: ShoΔHD lost protection, while PrPΔHD became neurotoxic.
- The N-terminal domain of PrP(C) could be functionally substituted by that of Sho, indicating conserved function.
Conclusions:
- Sho and PrP(C) exhibit conserved physiological activity in protecting cells from stress-induced toxicity.
- Both proteins rely on their N-terminal domains for stress-protective functions.
- Sho and PrP(C) likely operate through similar signaling pathways to mediate cellular protection.
Related Concept Videos
Other Stress Responses in Bacteria
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining, normally used to...
Conservation of Protein Domains
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to form...
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to form...
Bacterial Protein Maturation
Molecular Chaperones and Protein Folding
The...

