Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exposure-safety analyses of talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the TALAPRO-2 trial.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics·2026
Same author

Prediction of Ki-67 expression in invasive breast cancer with dual-modality radiomics.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Correction: CiCLoDS: Joint cell clustering and gene selection for single-cell spatial transcriptomics.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

CiCLoDS: Joint cell clustering and gene selection for single-cell spatial transcriptomics.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Optimizing Body Size-Based Dosing Approaches for Antibody-Drug Conjugates.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2025
Same author

Research on Deep Learning-Based Human-Robot Static/Dynamic Gesture-Driven Control Framework.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same journal

How to Replace the TQT Study-The Use of Concentration-QTc Modeling to Exclude a Small Effect of a Novel Drug on QT Interval: Historical Perspective and Implementation.

Journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Genome Sequencing Enhances Precision and Clinical Utility of Pharmacogenetic Data Compared to Arrays.

Journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
Same journal

FDA Gene Therapy Approvals (1998-2025): Current Status, Regulatory Evolution, and Future Directions.

Journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Human Disposition, Metabolism, and Excretion of Sevasemten (EDG-5506), a Selective Modulator of Fast Myosin in Healthy Volunteers.

Journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
Same journal

New Insights into Genetic Polymorphisms Influencing the Therapeutic Efficacy and Toxicity of Rivaroxaban.

Journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict the Pharmacokinetics of Sacubitril/Valsartan in the Elderly with Renal or Hepatic Impairment Population.

Journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Standardized visual predictive check versus visual predictive check for model evaluation.

Diane D Wang1, Shuzhong Zhang

  • 1Pfizer Oncology, San Diego, CA 92121, USA. diane.wang@pfizer.com

Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
|January 25, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The visual predictive check (VPC) can be misleading. A new standardized visual predictive check (SVPC) offers a reliable alternative for model evaluation in all situations.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacometrics
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Model Evaluation

Background:

  • The visual predictive check (VPC) is a standard method for evaluating population pharmacokinetic (PK) models.
  • Limitations of VPC include potential infeasibility or misleading results in specific scenarios, such as complex covariate stratification or varying study designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the performance and applicability of the standard VPC.
  • To introduce and validate the standardized visual predictive check (SVPC) as an improved model evaluation tool.
  • To compare SVPC with normalized prediction distribution error (npde).

Main Methods:

  • Simulation studies were conducted to evaluate VPC and SVPC performance.
  • SVPC was developed to display participant observation percentiles within simulated distributions, adjusted for individual designs.
  • The calculation of SVPC percentiles (P(i,j)) normalizes for subject-specific design features.

Main Results:

  • VPC is inappropriate when covariate stratification is difficult or arbitrary.
  • VPC may not be feasible with dynamic or varied study designs.
  • SVPC effectively addresses these limitations by isolating model misspecification and random effect estimation errors.

Conclusions:

  • The standardized visual predictive check (SVPC) is a robust and universally applicable tool for model evaluation.
  • SVPC provides a reliable alternative or complement to traditional VPC, enhancing model assessment accuracy.
  • SVPC can be utilized across all model evaluation scenarios, regardless of study design complexity.