Automated validation of genetic variants from large databases: ensuring that variant references refer to the same
Mark Y Tong1, Christopher A Cassa, Isaac S Kohane
1Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. mt153@hms.harvard.edu
Summary:
Accurate annotations of genomic variants are necessary to achieve full-genome clinical interpretations that are scientifically sound and medically relevant. Many disease associations, especially those reported before the completion of the HGP, are limited in applicability because of potential inconsistencies with our current standards for genomic coordinates, nomenclature and gene structure. In an effort to validate and link variants from the medical genetics literature to an unambiguous reference for each variant, we developed a software pipeline and reviewed 68 641 single amino acid mutations from Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) and dbSNP. The frequency of unresolved mutation annotations varied widely among the databases, ranging from 4 to 23%. A taxonomy of primary causes for unresolved mutations was produced.
Availability:
This program is freely available from the web site (http://safegene.hms.harvard.edu/aa2nt/).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets


