Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Comparison of CRT and CRT-D in heart failure: systematic review of controlled trials
1Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200001, China.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronisation-cardioverter defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) significantly reduced all-cause death compared to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in patients with left ventricular impairment. The benefit of CRT-D was more pronounced after one year of follow-up.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Limited comparative studies exist for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) versus CRT with cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-D) in patients with left ventricular (LV) impairment.
- Heart failure management in LV impairment requires effective therapeutic strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically analyze and compare the therapeutic effects of CRT and CRT-D in patients suffering from LV impairment and heart failure.
- To assess the impact of CRT-D on all-cause mortality in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted on the Medline database from 1970 to September 2010.
- Seven studies involving 3404 patients were included in the analysis.
- The primary outcome measure was the all-cause death rate.
Main Results:
- CRT-D demonstrated an 8.42% reduction in all-cause death compared to CRT (OR 0.52, P=0.001).
- This survival benefit was significant after one year of follow-up (OR 0.56, P=0.0004), but not within the first year (P=0.11).
- Secondary endpoints, including sudden cardiac death and heart failure mortality, also favored CRT-D.
Conclusions:
- CRT-D shows superiority over CRT in reducing all-cause and cardiac death rates after one year in patients with LV impairment.
- Further validation through larger, randomized, prospective trials with extended follow-up is recommended to confirm these findings.
Background:
Few studies have directly compared cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) with combined CRT-cardioverter defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) in patients with left ventricular (LV) impairment. We performed a systematic analysis to assess the therapeutic effects of CRT and CRT-D in patients with LV impairment and heart failure.
Methods:
The Medline database from 1970 to September 2010 was searched. The major outcome examined was the all-cause death rate.
Results:
A total of 3404 patients were retrieved from seven studies. Overall, CRT-D reduced all-cause death by 8.42% compared with CRT [odds ratio (OR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.81, P=0.001, I(2)=63.9%]. An increased benefit was seen after extended follow-up (after 1 year, OR 0.56, CI 0.41-0.77, P=0.0004, I(2)=64.9%), but not after relatively short follow-up (within 1 year, P=0.11). Results from other endpoints examined, such as death from sudden cardiac death and heart failure, also supported CRT-D treatment.
Conclusions:
Evidence from current randomised and non-randomised trials demonstrates some superiorities of CRT-D over CRT, such as all-cause death rate after one-year follow-up and cardiac death, in patients with LV impairment. However, these findings must be verified in larger, randomised, prospective trials, including with extended patient follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

