Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Three-dimensional Rendering and Analysis of Immunolabeled, Clarified Human Placental Villous Vascular Networks
Published on: March 29, 2018
Predictive value of fetal nuchal translucency
1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kragujevac Clinical Center, Kragujevac, Serbia. drloncar@sezampro.rs
Aim:
To determine the predictive value of fetal nuchal translucency (NT) measurements in the detection of chromosomopathy.
Methods:
The investigation of NT included 317 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies of gestational age of 11 to 14 weeks with pathological karyotype. The control group consisted of pregnant women whose amniocentesis findings indicated a normal fetal karyotype.
Results:
The median value of NT in the control group was 1.92 +/- 0.39 mm, and in the group with pathological fetus karyotype findings it was 2.49 +/- 0.37 mm (p < 0.05). The median value of crown-rump length was 64.83 +/- 8.23 mm and 60.12 +/- 8.48 mm in the control group and in the group with pathological karyotype, respectively. The gestational age in the control group was 87.10 +/- 87.10 days, while in the pathological group it was 85.69 +/- 3.98 days, which indicated the homogeneity of the investigated sample (p > 0.05). The probability for a patient with negative NT findings to be healthy was 1.0, NT sensitivity as a marker for chromosomopathy was 1.0. The rate of false positive findings was 0.026. The specificity of NT as a marker for chromosomopathy was 0.97.
Conclusion:
Normal NT findings could be considered reliable ultrasonographic markers in the assessment of the absence of chromosomopathy. Pathological findings, given the low positive predictive value of NT must be interpreted in the context of other prenatal tests before the pregnant woman is advised to undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
P-value
P-value stands for the probability value. P-value is the probability that, if the null hypothesis is true, the results from another randomly selected sample will be as extreme or more extreme as the results obtained from the given sample.
A large P-value calculated from the data indicates to not reject the null hypothesis. But a higher P-value does not mean that the null hypothesis is true. The smaller the P-value, the more unlikely...