Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Self-Regulation

Self-Regulation

Self-regulation, also known as self-control, encompasses a range of cognitive and behavioral processes that allow individuals to adjust their internal states and outward actions to align with socially acceptable norms and long-term goals. It plays a fundamental role in adaptive functioning, from resisting impulsive behaviors to persisting through challenging tasks. While its benefits are widely recognized, self-regulation is not limitless. Muraven and Baumeister's theory posits that...

Factors Affecting Perception

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Acoustilytix™: A Web-Based Automated Ultrasonic Vocalization Scoring Platform.

Brain sciences·2021

Same author

Spontaneous Ultrasonic Vocalization Transmission in Adult, Male Long-Evans Rats Is Age-Dependent and Sensitive to EtOH Modulation.

Brain sciences·2020

Same author

Procedural-Memory, Working-Memory, and Declarative-Memory Skills Are Each Associated With Dimensional Integration in Sound-Category Learning.

Frontiers in psychology·2018

Same author

Increased cognitive load enables unlearning in procedural category learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2018

Same author

Alcohol-naïve USVs distinguish male HAD-1 from LAD-1 rat strains.

Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)·2018

Same author

Quantitative modeling of category learning deficits in various patient populations.

Neuropsychology·2018

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Regulatory fit effects on stimulus identification.

Brian D Glass¹, W Todd Maddox, Arthur B Markman

¹Department of Psychology, University of Texas, 1 University Station, A8000, Austin, TX 78712, USA. glass@mail.utexas.edu

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

|January 26, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Regulatory focus matching task rewards enhances perception when familiarity is low, but influences response bias when familiarity is high. This impacts decision-making and may relate to clinical disorders.

More Related Videos

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Decision Science

Background:

Regulatory focus theory explains how individuals pursue goals based on gains (promotion) or losses (prevention).
Task reward structures can create local biases influencing decision-making.
The interplay between global regulatory focus and local task rewards on perception is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how regulatory fit (alignment between personal focus and task rewards) affects perceptual processing and judgment.
To examine the moderating role of internal familiarity and perceptual sensitivity in this regulatory fit effect.
To explore potential neurobiological underpinnings and clinical implications.

Main Methods:

Two experiments were conducted using briefly presented visual stimuli.
Participants were assigned to either a promotion or prevention regulatory focus condition.
An asymmetric payoff structure created a response bias, and perceptual sensitivity and familiarity were manipulated.

Main Results:

When familiarity and sensitivity were low, regulatory fit enhanced perceptual sensitivity.
When familiarity and sensitivity were high, regulatory fit led to a response bias towards the high-payoff stimulus.
No significant differences in perceptual sensitivity were found when familiarity and sensitivity were high.

Conclusions:

Regulatory fit influences perceptual processing and judgment, with effects varying based on task familiarity and sensitivity.
Findings suggest distinct mechanisms for perceptual enhancement versus response bias under different conditions.
The research offers insights into potential neurobiological bases and has implications for understanding disorders like depression.