Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Knee Joint

Knee Joint

The knee joint is the most complicated joint in the body. It consists of three articulations– two tibiofemoral and one patellofemoral. As is characteristic of synovial joints, the knee joint has a thin articular capsule that partially surrounds this joint cavity. Additionally, several ligaments, muscles, and cartilaginous structures support the movement of the knee.
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris group...

Development of the Limb Synovial Joints

Development of the Limb Synovial Joints

Joints form during embryonic development in conjunction with the formation and growth of the associated bones. The embryonic tissue that gives rise to all bones, cartilage, and connective tissues of the body is called mesenchyme.
The mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into chondrocytes that form the hyaline cartilage, and later the cartilaginous model of the bone. This model further transforms into a bone. This process is known as endochondral ossification.
During development, the limbs...

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...

Kinematic Equations - II

Kinematic Equations - II

The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...

Method of Joints: Problem Solving I

Method of Joints: Problem Solving I

The method of joints is a commonly used technique to analyze the forces in structural trusses. The method is based on the principle of equilibrium, which assumes that the truss members are connected by frictionless pins. The forces at each joint can be determined by considering the equilibrium of the forces acting on that joint. Consider a truss structure with two forces of 20 N and 10 N acting at joints C and D, respectively. The method of joints can be used to determine the forces FCB, FDC,...

Kinematic Equations - III

Kinematic Equations - III

The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Adaptive Time Propagation for Time-dependent Schrödinger equations.

International journal of applied and computational mathematics·2020

Same author

Computable upper error bounds for Krylov approximations to matrix exponentials and associated <math><mrow><mi>φ</mi></mrow></math> -functions.

BIT. Numerical mathematics·2020

Same author

Practical splitting methods for the adaptive integration of nonlinear evolution equations. Part I: Construction of optimized schemes and pairs of schemes.

BIT. Numerical mathematics·2019

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

Reconstructing the knee joint mechanism from kinematic data.

Irene Reichl, Winfried Auzinger, Heinz-Bodo Schmiedmayer

Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems

|January 29, 2011

Summary

This study compares knee joint models with and without orthogonality constraints. Constrained models improve accuracy with larger noise, while unconstrained models perform better with minimal noise in joint angle calculations.

More Related Videos

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

Area of Science:

Biomechanics
Orthopedics
Robotics

Background:

Joint kinematics interpretation depends on movement type, measurement techniques, and joint models.
Kinematic constraints can reduce degrees of freedom (DOFs), improving joint angle reproducibility by mitigating noise and errors.
A common approach models the knee as a hinge joint with limited varus/valgus rotation, often using orthogonality constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the impact of orthogonality constraints on knee joint rotation angle calculations.
To evaluate the performance of constrained versus unconstrained joint models under varying noise levels.

Main Methods:

Simulated knee joint motion to generate kinematic data.
Introduced varying levels of normally distributed noise to the simulated data.
Compared joint rotation angles derived from models with and without orthogonality constraints.

Main Results:

The unconstrained model yielded more accurate results for small noise levels.
The constrained model demonstrated higher accuracy when dealing with larger noise.
Model performance differences were attributed to the objective function's behavior near its minimum.

Conclusions:

The choice between constrained and unconstrained models depends on the expected level of noise in kinematic data.
Orthogonality constraints are beneficial for joint angle accuracy in the presence of significant measurement noise.
Understanding model sensitivity to noise is crucial for reliable joint kinematics analysis.