Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality and cost: choices and responsibilities.

A Donabedian1

  • 1School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.

Journal of Occupational Medicine. : Official Publication of the Industrial Medical Association
|December 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Healthcare providers balance effective, efficient care with patient preferences. When payers set different standards, professionals may oppose, adopt, or mediate these economic guidelines.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A founder of quality assessment encounters a troubled system firsthand. Interview by Fitzhugh Mullan.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2001
Same author

Evaluating physician competence.

Bulletin of the World Health Organization·2000
Same author

Paradoxical response to a novel influenza virus vaccine strain: the effect of prior immunization.

Vaccine·1999
Same author

The quality of care. How can it be assessed? 1988.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1997
Same author

The effectiveness of quality assurance.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·1996
Same author

Interview with Avedis Donabedian, M.D. Interview by Gordon Brown.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·1996

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Medical ethics
  • Healthcare policy

Background:

  • Healthcare providers aim for efficient and effective patient care.
  • Patient preferences can influence care decisions, sometimes diverging from purely efficient models.
  • Varying standards of optimal care between practitioners and payers create ethical and practical challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore how healthcare professionals respond to external standards of optimal care imposed by payers.
  • To analyze the potential conflicts between economic efficiency, patient preferences, and professional judgment in healthcare delivery.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of healthcare provider decision-making frameworks.
  • Exploration of ethical considerations in resource allocation and patient advocacy.
  • Discussion of potential professional responses to payer-driven healthcare standards.

Main Results:

  • Practitioners may prioritize patient preferences over maximum efficiency when costs are high and benefits marginal.
  • External payer standards for optimal care can lead to three distinct professional responses: opposition, adoption of economic optimum, or a hybrid approach.
  • The hybrid approach involves accepting payer specifications while preserving the practitioner's advocacy role and the profession's public good advocacy.

Conclusions:

  • Healthcare professionals face complex decisions when payer-defined optimal care conflicts with their own or patients' priorities.
  • The response to payer standards depends on balancing economic considerations, patient-centered care, and professional ethics.
  • Maintaining professional autonomy and patient advocacy is crucial when navigating external healthcare economic policies.

Related Experiment Videos