Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Transradial vs femoral percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease in octogenarians
Olivier F Bertrand1, Rodrigo Bagur, Olivier Costerousse
1Quebec Heart-Lung Institute, Quebec, Canada. olivier.bertrand@crhl.ulaval.ca
Insights
Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in octogenarians with left main disease offers outcomes comparable to the femoral approach. This method significantly reduces bleeding and access site complications in elderly patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Access
Background:
- Limited data exists on transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus femoral approach in high-risk elderly patients.
- Left main coronary artery disease (LMCD) poses significant risks, especially in octogenarians.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of transradial versus femoral approach for left main PCI in patients over 80 years old.
- To evaluate in-hospital and late clinical outcomes between the two access methods.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of octogenarian patients undergoing left main PCI.
- Comparison of outcomes between transradial (n=90) and femoral (n=13) access groups.
- Assessment of procedural success, complications, and long-term clinical events.
Main Results:
- Transradial PCI was performed in 87% of octogenarians with left main disease.
- Similar angiographic success rates (98% vs. 92%) and procedural characteristics were observed.
- Transradial approach showed significantly lower access site complications (6% vs. 31%, p=0.014) and a trend towards less bleeding (14% vs. 23%, p=0.42).
- No significant differences in 30-day or late adverse events (death, MI, revascularization) were noted between groups.
Conclusions:
- Transradial PCI is a safe and effective alternative to the femoral approach for left main interventions in octogenarians.
- The transradial route offers a significant reduction in access site complications and bleeding risk.
- This approach facilitates successful treatment with comparable acute and long-term results in elderly high-risk patients.
Background:
Little data is available on the immediate and late results of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to standard femoral approach in high-risk patients. Our objective was to compare our experience in > 80 years old patients undergoing left main PCI with transradial and femoral approach.
Methods:
This was a retrospective analysis of octogenarians patients treated for left main PCI in our center. In-hospital and late results were assessed
Results:
From 2002 to 2008, one hundred and three octogenarians underwent PCI for left main disease. Ninety (87%) patients were treated by transradial approach and 13 (13%) by femoral approach. Patients were older in the radial group (85 +/- 3 years vs 82 + 3 years, p = 0.0067). All patients were pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel. Patients received heparin-only in 90% of transradial cases and 85% of femoral cases (p = 0.63), bivalirudin in 0% vs 15% (p = 0.63) and platelets glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in 33% vs 23% (p = 0.54), respectively. Patients received 3 +/- 2 stents in both groups with no difference in the rate of drug eluting stents (44% vs 69%, p = 0.14). Angiographic success was obtained in 98% vs 92% (p = 0.34) respectively with similar fluoroscopic time, procedure duration and contrast volume. Procedures were performed in 5-6Fr in 93% of transradial cases and 85% of femoral cases (p = 0.14). At 30 days, deaths (6% vs 15%, p = 0.21), myocardial infarction (12% vs 15%, p = 0.67) and revascularization (1% vs 0%, p = 1.00) were similar in transradial and femoral cases, respectively. Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 14% of radial cases compared to 23% in femoral cases (p = 0.42). Access site complications, mostly hematoma occurred less frequently after transradial than femoral approach (6% vs 31%, p = 0.014). At follow-up, cardiac death (17% vs 150%, p = 1.00), MI (23% vs 23%, p = 1.00) and revascularization (11% vs 0%, p = 0.35) remained similar in both groups.
Conclusions:
The majority of octogenarians with left main disease can be treated by transradial approach with similar acute and long-term results as with femoral approach but with less risk of bleeding and access site complications.
More Related Videos
06:04Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation