Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Percutaneous Contrast Echocardiography-guided Intramyocardial Injection and Cell Delivery in a Large Preclinical Model
Published on: January 21, 2018
Hearts too good to die: an evaluation of coronary care
Insights
Coronary care units are standard for heart attacks, but a review suggests their benefits might be overestimated. Further evaluation is needed to confirm the true impact of intensive coronary care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Intensive coronary care has become the standard treatment for acute myocardial infarction.
- Coronary care units are widely established in hospitals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the actual contribution and benefits of intensive coronary care.
- To critically assess the established practices in acute myocardial infarction management.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of existing studies on intensive coronary care.
- Analysis of data to assess the impact of coronary care units.
Main Results:
- The promise of intensive coronary care may have been overstated.
- The benefits associated with coronary care units might be overestimated.
Conclusions:
- Further critical evaluation of intensive coronary care is warranted.
- The established role of coronary care units requires reassessment based on evidence.
Abstract:
Intensive coronary care has become the standard treatment for acute myocardial infarction, and no self-respecting hospital would be without its coronary care unit. However, literature review to evaluate the contribution of coronary care shows that its promise may have been overstated and its benefits overestimated.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
