Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A custom soil electrochemical profiling system for detecting electrochemical activity changes in soil.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Socio-economic determinants of the second-dose measles vaccination coverage in Poland.

Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM·2026

Same author

A Computational Community Blind Challenge on Pan-Coronavirus Drug Discovery Data.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026

Same author

Biofilms at work: what limits efficient consortia for industrial production?

Trends in biotechnology·2026

Same author

Adipokine visfatin as a response of an efficient placenta to key pregnancy risk factors.

Placenta·2025

Same author

Safety trial assessing 1.77 cm<sup>2</sup> H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> producing electrochemical bandages on healthy human skin.

Scientific reports·2025

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Concurrent Quantification of Cellular and Extracellular Components of Biofilms

Concurrent Quantification of Cellular and Extracellular Components of Biofilms

Published on: December 10, 2013

Biofilm image reconstruction for assessing structural parameters.

Ryan Renslow¹, Zbigniew Lewandowski, Haluk Beyenal

¹The Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

|February 1, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Commonly used structural parameters may not accurately represent biofilm structures. Even with identical parameter values, biofilms can exhibit different structures, highlighting limitations in current biofilm image analysis.

More Related Videos

Automated 3D Optical Coherence Tomography to Elucidate Biofilm Morphogenesis Over Large Spatial Scales

Automated 3D Optical Coherence Tomography to Elucidate Biofilm Morphogenesis Over Large Spatial Scales

Published on: August 21, 2019

Remote Magnetic Actuation of Micrometric Probes for in situ 3D Mapping of Bacterial Biofilm Physical Properties

Remote Magnetic Actuation of Micrometric Probes for in situ 3D Mapping of Bacterial Biofilm Physical Properties

Published on: May 2, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Concurrent Quantification of Cellular and Extracellular Components of Biofilms

Concurrent Quantification of Cellular and Extracellular Components of Biofilms

Published on: December 10, 2013

Automated 3D Optical Coherence Tomography to Elucidate Biofilm Morphogenesis Over Large Spatial Scales

Automated 3D Optical Coherence Tomography to Elucidate Biofilm Morphogenesis Over Large Spatial Scales

Published on: August 21, 2019

Remote Magnetic Actuation of Micrometric Probes for in situ 3D Mapping of Bacterial Biofilm Physical Properties

Remote Magnetic Actuation of Micrometric Probes for in situ 3D Mapping of Bacterial Biofilm Physical Properties

Published on: May 2, 2014

Area of Science:

Microbiology
Biophysics
Image Analysis

Background:

Biofilm structure is quantified using numerical parameters from microscopy images.
These parameters are crucial for comparing biofilms and assessing factors like antibiotic effects and environmental conditions.
The hypothesis that similar parameter values indicate similar biofilm structures remains untested.

Purpose of the Study:

To test if commonly used structural parameters can accurately characterize differences or similarities between biofilm structures.
To evaluate the reliability of structural parameters in representing actual biofilm architecture.
To determine the limitations of current biofilm image analysis methods.

Main Methods:

Developed biofilm image reconstruction as a novel tool for assessing structural parameters.
Assessed variability by performing independent reconstructions from identical starting parameters.
Evaluated the influence of original image parameter values on reconstruction success.
Investigated the impact of parameter quantity and type on reconstruction outcomes.

Main Results:

Identical structural parameter values do not guarantee visually similar biofilm structures.
The number and size of clusters within an original biofilm image significantly affect image reconstruction success.
A limited set of arbitrarily chosen parameters may fail to capture essential differences between biofilm structures.

Conclusions:

Commonly used structural parameters may be insufficient to fully characterize biofilm architecture.
Biofilm image analysis requires careful consideration of parameter selection and potential reconstruction limitations.
Further research is needed to develop more robust methods for biofilm structural characterization.