Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026
11:19
Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
Published on: July 4, 2016
Precise dipolar coupling constant distribution analysis in proton multiple-quantum NMR of elastomers.
Walter Chassé1, Juan López Valentín, Geoffrey D Genesky
1Institut für Physik-NMR, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Betty-Heimann-Str. 7, D-06120 Halle, Germany. walter.chasse@physik.uni-halle.de
The Journal of Chemical Physics
|February 2, 2011
Summary
This study introduces a new method for analyzing nuclear magnetic resonance data in polymer gels. The improved approach accurately determines residual dipolar coupling constants, offering insights into polymer network structures.
Area of Science:
- Polymer Chemistry
- Materials Science
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is crucial for characterizing polymer materials.
- Analyzing (1)H double-quantum NMR build-up data is key to understanding polymer gel and elastomer properties.
- Previous methods faced limitations in determining accurate residual dipolar coupling constants and their distributions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present an improved analytical approach for (1)H double-quantum NMR build-up data.
- To enhance the determination of residual dipolar coupling constants and their distributions in polymer gels and elastomers.
- To provide insights into crosslink density and spatial inhomogeneities within polymer networks.
Main Methods:
- Introduction of a new generic build-up function for component fitting and fast Tikhonov regularization (ftikreg).
- Development of a robust method for estimating the error parameter in regularization.
- Application and demonstration of the method on inhomogeneous elastomers with varying coupling constant distributions.
Main Results:
- The new method yields faithful residual dipolar coupling constant distributions, overcoming limitations of previous approaches.
- Accurate determination of coupling constants and their distributions is achieved.
- The approach provides valuable information on crosslink density and material inhomogeneities.
Conclusions:
- The developed method offers a significant improvement for analyzing NMR build-up data in polymer systems.
- This technique enables more precise characterization of polymer gels and elastomers.
- The findings contribute to a better understanding of polymer network structures and properties.
Related Concept Videos
01:08Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
01:13¹H NMR: Complex Splitting
A proton M that is coupled to a proton X results in doublet signals for M. However, NMR-active nuclei can be simultaneously coupled to more than one nonequivalent nucleus. When M is coupled to a second proton A, such as in styrene oxide, each peak in the doublet is split into another doublet.
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied first.
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied first.
01:27¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
01:17Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
01:22Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
01:13¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns
When protons A and X are coupled, their nuclear spin energy levels are slightly modified. This is because the energy required to excite proton A to a spin state parallel to proton X is slightly different from the energy required for it to become anti-parallel to spin X. Consequently, there are two possible excitation frequencies for A (A1 and A2), depending on the spin state of X, and vice versa. The mutual nature of coupling implies that the difference between frequencies A1 and A2, indicated...