Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
A comparison of two-dimensional techniques for converting magnetocardiogram maps into effective current source
K Ogata1, A Kandori, T Miyashita
1Advanced Research Laboratory, Hitachi Ltd., Higashi-Koigakubo, Kokubunji, Tokyo, Japan. kuniomi.ogata.fb@hitachi.com
This study presents a method to convert pseudo-2D current-arrow map (CAM) data into accurate physical current distributions using Tikhonov regularization. The conversion is dependent on the reconstruction depth, enabling more precise analysis of magnetocardiographic signals.
Area of Science:
- Biophysics
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Current-arrow maps (CAM) provide pseudo-two-dimensional current data.
- Accurate physical current distribution is crucial for interpreting physiological signals like magnetocardiography (MCG).
- Existing methods require conversion of CAM data to physical current for detailed analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a method for converting pseudo-2D CAM current data into physical current distributions.
- To establish a relationship between CAM data and physical current using Tikhonov regularization.
- To determine the optimal regularization parameter for accurate current reconstruction in MCG analysis.
Main Methods:
- Optimal solution in a least mean square sense with Tikhonov regularization (LMSTR) was employed.
- Current dipole simulations were used to calculate current pattern differences (ΔJ) with varying regularization parameters (α).
- Magnetocardiographic (MCG) signals from healthy subjects were analyzed, correlating CAM and LMSTR current values, and regression analysis was performed against reconstruction depth (z(d)).
Main Results:
- Minimal current pattern differences (ΔJ) were observed with a regularization parameter α ≈ 10⁻¹⁰.
- This optimal parameter (α = 10⁻¹⁰) yielded minimal ΔJ at key points (P-wave, QRS-complex, T-wave peaks) in MCG signals.
- High correlation coefficients (>0.9) were found between CAM and LMSTR current values, with regression slopes (y) strongly correlated with reconstruction depth (z(d)) (r = -0.93).
Conclusions:
- The study successfully established a conversion method from CAM pseudo-2D current to LMSTR physical current.
- The conversion factor is the slope (y) derived from the regression line, which is dependent on the reconstruction depth (z(d)).
- This depth-dependent conversion allows for the transformation of CAM results into effective physical current distributions for improved MCG analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Mesh Analysis with Current Sources
Current Source in One Mesh: The analysis process is straightforward when a current source is found in only one mesh within the circuit. Mesh currents are assigned as usual, with the mesh containing the current source excluded from the analysis. Kirchhoff's voltage law (KVL)...
Bode Plots Construction
Source Transformation for AC Circuits
Source Transformation
It is essential to note that when...
Magnetic Force On A Current-Carrying Conductor
Consider a compass placed near a current-carrying wire. The wire experiences a force that aligns the needle of the compass tangentially around the wire. Thus, the current-carrying wire produces concentric circular loops of magnetic field. The magnetic field generated by a wire can be...
Mesh Analysis
A fundamental concept in mesh analysis is the definition of meshes and mesh currents. A mesh is a closed...

