Related Experiment Videos
Microleakage of five temporary endodontic restorative materials
M K Hagemeier1, R L Cooley, J L Hicks
1USAF Hospital Bergstrom, Texas.
Summary
This study assessed five interim endodontic restorative materials for microleakage. TERM, Cavit, and the IRM-Cavit sandwich demonstrated superior sealing, while Ketac-Silver and IRM showed significant leakage.
Area of Science:
- Endodontics
- Dental Materials Science
- Restorative Dentistry
Background:
- Effective interim restoration is crucial in endodontic therapy to prevent bacterial ingress.
- Material selection impacts the success of sealing endodontic access preparations between appointments.
- Microleakage remains a significant concern, potentially leading to treatment failure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the microleakage resistance of five commonly used interim endodontic restorative materials.
- To determine the efficacy of a "sandwich" technique using IRM and Cavit.
- To identify materials suitable for temporary coronal sealing in endodontic procedures.
Main Methods:
- Sixty extracted human molars underwent endodontic access preparation.
- Access cavities were sealed with TERM, Cavit, IRM, Ketac-Silver, or an IRM-Cavit combination.
- Specimens were subjected to thermocycling, dye immersion, and microscopic evaluation for microleakage.
Main Results:
- TERM, Cavit, and the IRM-Cavit "sandwich" restoration exhibited minimal to no microleakage.
- Ketac-Silver and IRM demonstrated substantial or gross microleakage.
- Significant differences in sealing ability were observed among the tested materials.
Conclusions:
- TERM, Cavit, and the IRM-Cavit "sandwich" are effective interim endodontic restorative materials with excellent sealing properties.
- Ketac-Silver and IRM are not recommended as reliable interim restorative materials due to significant microleakage.
- Material choice is critical for preventing coronal microleakage and ensuring endodontic treatment success.