Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Projected survival gains from revising state laws requiring written opt-in consent for HIV testing
Michael D April1, John J Chiosi, A David Paltiel
1Division of General Medicine, MGH, 50 Staniford St, 9th Fl, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Michael_April@hms.harvard.edu
Background:
Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends HIV testing in all settings unless patients refuse (opt-out consent), many state laws require written opt-in consent.
Objective:
To quantify potential survival gains from passing state laws streamlining HIV testing consent.
Design:
We retrieved surveillance data to estimate the current annual HIV diagnosis rate in states with laws requiring written opt-in consent (19.3%). Published data informed the effect of removing that requirement on diagnosis rate (48.5% increase). These parameters then served as input for a model-driven projection of survival based on consent method. Other inputs included undiagnosed HIV prevalence (0.101%); and annual HIV incidence (0.023%).
Patients:
Hypothetical cohort of adults (>13 years) living in written opt-in states.
Measurements:
Life years gained (LYG).
Results:
In the base-case, of the 53,036,383 adult persons living in written opt-in states, 0.66% (350,040) will be infected with HIV. Due to earlier diagnosis, revised consent laws yield 1.5 LYG per HIV-infected person, corresponding to 537,399 LYG among this population. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that diagnosis rate increases of 24.8-72.3% result in 304,765-724,195 LYG. Net survival gains vanish if the proportion of HIV-infected persons refusing all testing in response to revised laws exceeds 18.2%.
Conclusions:
The potential survival gains of increased testing are substantial, suggesting that state laws requiring opt-in HIV testing should be revised.
Related Concept Videos
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

