Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026
Development and Maintenance of a Preclinical Patient Derived Tumor Xenograft Model for the Investigation of Novel Anti-Cancer Therapies
Published on: September 30, 2016
Cetuximab and panitumumab in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
Fausto Petrelli1, Karen Borgonovo, Mary Cabiddu
1Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio-Caravaggio, Treviglio (BG), Italy. faupe@libero.it
Background:
Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies (panitumumab [P] and cetuximab [C]) are approved and effective only in KRAS wild-type patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The purpose of our meta-analysis is to evaluate the real effects of C and P in KRAS wild-type patients treated in randomized trials.
Patients And Methods:
Eligible studies included prospective, randomized, and controlled trials in which either C or P had been added to standard antineoplastic therapy or best supportive care and data for KRAS wild-type patients only had been calculated. Six thousand three hundred ninety-five patients' tumor samples have been analyzed (total wild-type n = 3,254; experimental arm n = 1,608; control arm n = 1,646). Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for response rate were calculated, as well as hazard ratios (HRs)for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.
Results:
The overall RR of response rate is 1.69 (p = 0.003) in all trials. The overall HRs for PFS and survival are 0.65 (p = 0.0006) and 0.84 (p = 0.03), respectively, and both are significant. The HRs for PFS and survival in C trials are 0.64 and 0.79, respectively, and 0.65 and 0.87, respectively, in P trials, although only the results achieved in P trials are significant (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.03). Both response rate (RR = 10.94) and PFS (HR = 0.51) have increased more in pretreated patients than in first-line trials.
Conclusion:
The addition of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies to standard anticancer therapy in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer showed an overall significantly increased risk of objective response rate and increased progression-free and overall survival. Only the results achieved in P randomized trials are significant, and the strongest results have been achieved in pretreated patients.
