Retroactive inhibition as a function of the locus of categorized response sets
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
1Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 15260, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract:
The effects which list-level taxonomic attributes should have upon retroactive inhibition (RI) producing mechanisms in both response-set interference theory (Postman & Stark, 1969) and Petrich's (1975) retrieval model are discussed. A test of the theories was performed by manipulating the presence (1) or absence (0) of categorized response sets in both original learning (OL) and interpolated learning IIL), and comparing their predictions concerning the relative degree of RI expected in the four conditions (0-0, 0-1, 1-0, 1-1). In line with Petrich's predictions, OL categorization significantly reduced RI, IL categorization significantly increased RI, and 0-1 produced significantly greater RI than 1-0. Moreover, the obtained ranking of the means for the experimental groups in degree of RI (0-1>0-0>1-0 ≅ 1-1) was in close agreement with the ranking predicted by Petrich's (1975) model. The results provide support for Petrich's (1975) retrieval model and pose explanatory problems for response-set interference theory (Postman & Stark, 1969).
Related Concept Videos
Feedback Inhibition
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Rotter's Locus of Control
Individuals with an internal locus of control believe that their personal efforts and decisions directly affect their...
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
Locus of Control
Root-Locus Method
This system can be represented by a block diagram,...

