Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Labeling DNA Probes03:31

Labeling DNA Probes

DNA probes are fragments of DNA labeled with a reporter tag to enable their detection or purification. The resulting labeled DNA probes can then hybridize to target nucleic acid sequences through complementary base-pairing, and may be used to recover or identify these regions.
Radioisotopes, fluorophores, or small molecule binding partners like biotin or digoxigenin, are the most widely used reporter tags for labeling DNA probes. These labels can be attached to the probe DNA molecule via...
In-situ Hybridization02:31

In-situ Hybridization

In situ hybridization (ISH) is a technique used to detect and localize specific DNA or RNA molecules in cells, tissue, or tissue sections using a labeled probe. The technique was first used in 1969 for the investigation of nucleic acids. It is currently an essential tool in scientific research and clinical settings, especially for diagnostic purposes.
Types of probes and labels
A probe is a complementary strand of DNA or RNA that binds to corresponding nucleotide sequences in a cell. Many...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Priming impossible figures in the object decision test: The critical importance of perceived stimulus complexity.

Psychonomic bulletin & reviewยท2013
Same author

Retrieval processes for serial order information.

Memory & cognitionยท2013
Same author

Remembering words not presented in lists: Can we avoid creating false memories?

Psychonomic bulletin & reviewยท2011
Same author

Generative processes in character classification: Evidence for a probe encoding set.

Memory & cognitionยท2011
Same author

The role of attention and study time in explicit and implicit memory for unfamiliar visual stimuli.

Memory & cognitionยท1998
Same author

The mere exposure effect is differentially sensitive to different judgment tasks.

Consciousness and cognitionยท1998
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognitionยท2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognitionยท2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognitionยท2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognitionยท2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognitionยท2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognitionยท2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Whole Mount in Situ Hybridization of E8.5 to E11.5 Mouse Embryos
13:54

Whole Mount in Situ Hybridization of E8.5 to E11.5 Mouse Embryos

Published on: October 10, 2011

Effects of generative processes on probe identification time.

J G Seamon1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, 06457, Middletown, Connecticut.

Memory & Cognition
|February 3, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Rehearsal speeds up probe naming when the probe matches the last rehearsed item, indicating generative processes influence stimulus preprocessing and require conscious attention.

More Related Videos

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Radioactive in situ Hybridization for Detecting Diverse Gene Expression Patterns in Tissue
17:38

Radioactive in situ Hybridization for Detecting Diverse Gene Expression Patterns in Tissue

Published on: April 27, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Whole Mount in Situ Hybridization of E8.5 to E11.5 Mouse Embryos
13:54

Whole Mount in Situ Hybridization of E8.5 to E11.5 Mouse Embryos

Published on: October 10, 2011

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Radioactive in situ Hybridization for Detecting Diverse Gene Expression Patterns in Tissue
17:38

Radioactive in situ Hybridization for Detecting Diverse Gene Expression Patterns in Tissue

Published on: April 27, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Information Processing

Background:

  • Rehearsal is known to reduce reaction time in character classification tasks when probes match targets.
  • Generative processes in rehearsal may reduce response time through stimulus activation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if rehearsal's generative process impacts probe naming time.
  • To determine the effect of rehearsal on stimulus activation and preprocessing.

Main Methods:

  • A letter identification baseline was established.
  • Subjects performed a probe naming task after rehearsing target letters.
  • Naming latencies and rehearsal accuracy were recorded.

Main Results:

  • Naming latencies increased with rehearsal, suggesting conscious attention is required.
  • Probe naming was faster when the probe matched the last rehearsed target.
  • Target set size did not affect probe identification time.

Conclusions:

  • Rehearsal influences probe encoding time via stimulus preprocessing.
  • Generative processes play a role in attention and response time reduction.