Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing01:23

Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing

Focusing involves centering a conversation on a message's critical elements or concepts. Focusing is valuable if the talk is vague or patients begin to repeat themselves. Sometimes, when patients are asked about their symptoms, they may go off-topic and try to tell their entire life story. Respectfully, the nurse should bring the conversation back into focus.
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploration of Potential Determinants of Implementation of a Clinical Practice Guide to Enhance Physical Activity Participation of Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder.

Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada·2026
Same author

Inclusion of People Aging With Disabilities in Sports and Leisure: An Environmental Scan on Opportunities and Capacity-Building Needs in Quebec, Canada.

Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society·2026
Same author

Preventing homelessness in adults with acquired brain injury: a mixed-methods rapid review.

Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine·2026
Same author

Knowledge mobilization through audit and feedback: a scoping review of applications in rehabilitation.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Advancing the definition and methodology of environmental scans in the context of health service delivery: an online modified Delphi study in real time.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Acceptability of rehabilitation exoskeletons of users with spinal cord injury and healthcare professionals: a systematic review.

Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine·2025

Related Experiment Videos

Consensus group sessions: a useful method to reconcile stakeholders' perspectives about network performance

Marie-Eve Lamontagne1, Bonnie R Swaine, André Lavoie

  • 1École de réadaptation [School of Rehabilitation], University of Montréal, P.O. Box 6128, Station Centre-ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.

International Journal of Integrated Care
|February 4, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Consensus techniques, like group discussions, effectively reconcile differing stakeholder views on traumatic brain injury (TBI) network performance evaluation. This process harmonizes values and resolves differences, achieving full agreement where individual perceptions initially varied.

Keywords:
brain injuryevaluationintegrated health care deliverynetworkperformance

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Trauma Care Systems

Background:

  • Developing effective performance evaluation frameworks for networks requires stakeholder alignment.
  • Consensus methods can bridge differing stakeholder perceptions on evaluation dimensions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess if organizations within traumatic brain injury (TBI) networks perceive performance evaluation dimensions differently.
  • To explore the efficacy of group consensus sessions in reconciling these diverse perceptions.

Main Methods:

  • The TRIAGE consensus technique was employed, integrating individual and group data collection phases.
  • Structured group discussions were utilized to foster consensus among network stakeholders.

Main Results:

  • Initial individual data showed low consensus among 139 professionals from 43 organizations across eight TBI networks.
  • Consensus group sessions achieved 100% agreement on performance dimensions within each network.
  • Group discussions facilitated understanding of scoring rationales, difference resolution, and value harmonization.

Conclusions:

  • Group discussions within consensus techniques are valuable for reconciling divergent stakeholder perceptions of network performance.
  • This approach enhances shared understanding and agreement in TBI network evaluation.