Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

09:43
Hand-held Clinical Photoacoustic Imaging System for Real-time Non-invasive Small Animal Imaging
Published on: October 16, 2017
Evidence requirements for innovative imaging devices: from concept to adoption
Richard A Frank1, Donald W Rucker, Michael A Ferguson
1GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ, USA. richard.frank@ge.com
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
|February 5, 2011
Summary
Regulatory and reimbursement changes in US imaging demand more clinical evidence. Generating this evidence across product lifecycle phases is crucial for patient access to innovative imaging technologies.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Health Economics
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- The US regulatory and reimbursement landscape for medical imaging is evolving.
- There's a growing demand for robust clinical evidence demonstrating efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of imaging innovations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the five phases of an imaging product's lifecycle.
- To identify the distinct clinical evidence needs at each lifecycle phase.
- To explore the implications of evidence generation costs and responsibilities.
Main Methods:
- The authors describe a five-phase model for imaging product development.
- Analysis of clinical evidence requirements throughout the product lifecycle.
- Discussion of the challenges posed by the pace of technological advancement versus evidence generation timelines.
Main Results:
- Imaging product lifecycles include design, regulatory approval, early adoption, reimbursement, and full adoption.
- Each phase necessitates specific types of clinical evidence.
- A significant gap exists between rapid technological progress and the time needed for formal clinical trials.
Conclusions:
- The increasing cost and complexity of generating clinical evidence pose challenges to innovation adoption.
- The mismatch between technology development and evidence requirements risks limiting patient access to beneficial imaging advancements.
- Careful consideration of public and payer evidence demands is essential for future diagnostic imaging improvements.

