Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
Language01:16

Language

Language is a unique communication system that uses words and systematic rules to organize and transmit information. Unlike other forms of communication, which may involve postures, movements, odors, or vocalizations, language relies on symbols and grammar. This makes human communication distinct from that of other species, who also communicate but do not use language in the same way humans do.
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...
Components of Language01:24

Components of Language

Language, whether spoken, signed, or written, consists of specific components: lexicon and grammar. The lexicon is the vocabulary of a language, comprising its words. Grammar is the set of rules used to convey meaning through the lexicon. For example, English grammar adds “-ed” to most verbs to indicate past tense. Words are formed by combining phonemes, which are the basic sound units of a language. Different languages have different sets of phonemes (e.g., “ah” vs. “eh”). Phonemes combine to...
Jung's Analytical Theory01:23

Jung's Analytical Theory

Carl Jung, a Swiss psychiatrist and former follower of Freud, eventually broke away from Freud's ideas to create his framework, analytical psychology. This approach emphasizes achieving a balance between the conscious and unconscious aspects of the mind and reconciling various experiences within an individual's personality. Jung believed that this process, which typically unfolds in the latter part of life, involves an ongoing journey of recognizing and incorporating unconscious elements into...
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Universal pluralism: Appreciating and exploring both similarity and difference across people and cultures.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Frank John Vattano (1931-2025).

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Bernard Spilka (1926-2025).

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Guided by the evidence: Reply to Paniagua (2026).

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Randomized controlled trials confirm the efficacy of psychological interventions and medications: Commentary on Jobes and Barnett (2025).

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Summary report of journal operations, 2025.

The American psychologist·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

Dynamical systems and Jung, with a note on language.

Bruce E Barrett1

  • 1Lesley University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. bbarrett@lesley.edu

The American Psychologist
|February 9, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This commentary critiques the term "hysteresis" in dynamical systems theory for conflict analysis. It proposes alternative terms like "bivalence" to avoid problematic connotations and enhance clarity in understanding complex systems.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

Area of Science:

  • Dynamical Systems Theory
  • Conflict Analysis
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Dynamical systems theory offers a novel perspective on intractable conflicts.
  • The term "hysteresis" is borrowed from mathematical history to describe system states.
  • The original article "Rethinking Intractable Conflict: The Perspective of Dynamical Systems" by Vallacher et al. is discussed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comment on the application of dynamical systems theory to intractable conflicts.
  • To address the problematic connotations of the term "hysteresis" in this context.
  • To propose alternative terminology for clarity and inclusivity.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of terminology.
  • Critique of the term "hysteresis" based on its etymology and potential misinterpretation.
  • Proposal of new terms: "bivalence," "trivalence," and "multivalence."

Main Results:

  • The term "hysteresis" carries potentially negative and unintended connotations, particularly relating to gender and emotionality.
  • Existing terminology may inadvertently create conflict with feminist theorists.
  • New terms are proposed to more accurately and neutrally describe dynamical systems with varying numbers of attractors.

Conclusions:

  • The adoption of "hysteresis" in conflict studies risks misinterpretation and offense.
  • Alternative terms like "bivalence" and "multivalence" offer a more precise and less problematic vocabulary.
  • Refining terminology is crucial for advancing the understanding of complex dynamical systems in conflict research.