Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Masking and Demasking Agents01:19

Masking and Demasking Agents

EDTA titrations may necessitate masking and demasking agents to temporarily protect a particular metal ion in a mixture from the EDTA reaction. These agents facilitate the sequential analysis of the metal ions by forming stable complexes with some—but not all—metal ions during certain steps.
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on the metal...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrative Modeling of Individual Differences Recognizing Speech in Noise by Hearing-Impaired Adults.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2022
Same author

The Listener Effect in Multitalker Speech Segregation and Talker Identification.

Trends in hearing·2021
Same author

A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2020
Same author

Auditory preference of children with autism spectrum disorders.

Cognitive processing·2016
Same author

Modulation of the Tumor Metastatic Microenvironment and Multiple Signal Pathways by Prunella vulgaris in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

The American journal of Chinese medicine·2016
Same journal

Sibilant differentiation before and after tongue cancer surgery: Acoustics, kinematics and the role of sensorimotor controla).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

BioNet-A: Ultrasonic echo representation network for target discrimination using active SONAR.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Empty soft-drink cans and mass-loaded rods: Analogous homework problems from acoustic and mechanical domains.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Statistical wave field theory: Anisotropic wave fields under Neumann's boundary condition [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 159(3), 2265-2280 (2026)].

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

On the modification of tip leakage noise sources by porous treatment.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

An educational opportunity: Acoustics in an empty room.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

A method for evaluating the relation between sound source segregation and masking.

Robert A Lutfi1, Ching-Ju Liu

  • 1Auditory Behavioral Research Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA. ralutfi@wisc.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|February 10, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method to distinguish between masking and sound source segregation, crucial for understanding auditory perception. The findings help clarify how we separate sounds in complex auditory environments.

More Related Videos

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Sound source segregation allows perception of individual sounds in a mixture.
  • Auditory masking hinders hearing one sound due to another.
  • Masking is often presumed to stem from segregation failure, but this link needs examination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a method for differentiating the effects of masking and sound source segregation.
  • To investigate the relationship between masking and segregation in auditory perception studies.
  • To provide an applied example of the proposed methodology.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel analytical framework to assess auditory perception.
  • Application of the method to a specific auditory scenario.
  • Comparative analysis of masking and segregation effects.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method successfully distinguishes between masking and segregation.
  • Empirical data illustrates the distinct contributions of masking and segregation.
  • The study provides a clearer understanding of auditory scene analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Masking and sound source segregation are not always directly related.
  • The developed method offers a valuable tool for auditory research.
  • Accurate differentiation is key to understanding complex auditory processing.