Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hemifield differences in perceived spatial frequency.

G K Edgar1, A T Smith

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Wales College of Cardiff, UK.

Perception
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Malignant transformation in a cohort of patients with oral epithelial dysplasia.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2021
Same author

Three changes to reduce the loss of dual degree trainees from OMFS national specialty selection in the UK: evidence based proposals.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2021
Same author

Connectivity of the Cingulate Sulcus Visual Area (CSv) in Macaque Monkeys.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2020
Same author

Hyperexcitability of brain stem pathways in cerebral palsy.

Journal of neurophysiology·2018
Same author

Measuring health-related benefit and quality of care in oral and maxillofacial surgery: British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Outcomes Project.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2018
Same author

Errors in interpretation of neck levels in postoperative pathological specimens.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2016
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The frustration of a small <i>n</i>.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Why do we have two eyes.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Perception of spatial frequency in the visual field shows bias. Stationary sinewave gratings were perceived as having higher spatial frequency in the left and lower visual hemifields compared to the right and upper visual hemifields.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Spatial frequency perception is crucial for visual processing.
  • Understanding visual field asymmetries can reveal underlying neural mechanisms.
  • Previous research suggests potential biases in visual perception across different hemifields.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether perceived spatial frequency differs across visual hemifields.
  • To determine if any observed asymmetries are dependent on spatial frequency or viewing condition (monocular vs. binocular).
  • To explore the origin of potential spatial frequency perception biases.

Main Methods:

  • Participants (n=10) judged the spatial frequency of stationary sinewave gratings.
  • Stimuli were presented at equal eccentricity in the left, right, upper, and lower visual hemifields.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tasks were performed binocularly and, for a subset of participants, monocularly, across 1, 2, and 4 cycles per degree.

    • Main Results:

    • A majority of participants overestimated spatial frequency in the left and lower visual hemifields compared to the right and upper visual hemifields.
    • This perceptual asymmetry was consistent across all tested spatial frequencies (1, 2, and 4 cycles deg-1).
    • The results remained consistent for monocular (left or right eye) and binocular viewing, suggesting a non-retinal origin.

    Conclusions:

    • Perceived spatial frequency is not uniform across the visual field, with a bias towards overestimation in the left and lower hemifields.
    • This spatial frequency perception asymmetry is independent of the tested spatial frequencies and viewing conditions.
    • The findings suggest that the observed differences in perceived spatial frequency are likely due to central visual processing rather than retinal differences.