Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype

Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by high blood glucose levels due to inadequate insulin production, insulin resistance, or both. The condition affects millions worldwide and can significantly impact their health and quality of life.
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...

Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis

Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis

Type 2 diabetes mellitus develops gradually and is often asymptomatic in early stages.Clinical ManifestationsWhen symptoms appear, they include fatigue, blurred vision, pruritus, delayed wound healing, and recurrent infections, particularly candidal infections. Peripheral neuropathy may present as numbness or tingling in the extremities. Classic hyperglycemia symptoms—polyuria, polydipsia, and polyphagia—are less common. Most patients are overweight and frequently have associated hypertension...

Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational

Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational

Type 2 diabetes, characterized by insulin resistance, arises when the insulin receptors on cells lose responsiveness to insulin, diminishing the cell's capacity to take up glucose, resulting in elevated blood glucose levels. To receive a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes, a series of blood glucose tests are necessary to assess whether the blood glucose falls within normal parameters. If the result is out of the normal range, a patient may be diagnosed as prediabetic or diabetic, depending on the...

Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy

Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy

The therapy for diabetes aims to alleviate hyperglycemia-related symptoms, prevent acute metabolic decompensation, and reduce chronic end-organ complications. Glycemic control is evaluated through short-term (self-monitoring, continuous glucose monitoring) and long-term (A1c, fructosamine) metrics, enabling near real-time tracking of blood glucose levels and reflecting glycemic control over specific time frames.
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Real-world obesity prevalence and history in 79 271 patients receiving systemic anticancer therapy across 13 cancer types in England (2013-2023).

ESMO real world data and digital oncology·2026

Same author

Extensive Secondary Cratering From the InSight Sol 1034a Impact Event.

Journal of geophysical research. Planets·2024

Same author

Using the Melosh Model of Acoustic Fluidization to Simulate Impact Crater Collapse on the Earth and Moon.

Journal of geophysical research. Planets·2024

Same author

Largest recent impact craters on Mars: Orbital imaging and surface seismic co-investigation.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2022

Same author

Meteoroid Fragmentation in the Martian Atmosphere and the Formation of Crater Clusters.

Journal of geophysical research. Planets·2022

Same author

Machine learning and statistical prediction of fastball velocity with biomechanical predictors.

Journal of biomechanics·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Modification and validation of the Revised Diabetes Knowledge Scale.

G S Collins¹, S Mughal, A H Barnett

¹Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Diabetic Medicine : a Journal of the British Diabetic Association

|February 12, 2011

Summary

A new Simplified Diabetes Knowledge Scale (SDKS) offers a brief, reliable tool for assessing diabetes knowledge. This true/false format demonstrates favorable psychometric properties and ease of use compared to the original scale.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Health Sciences
Medical Education
Psychometrics

Background:

Diabetes knowledge is crucial for self-management.
Existing diabetes knowledge scales may be lengthy or complex.
A simplified, validated tool is needed for efficient assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate a simplified true/false response format of the Revised Diabetes Knowledge Scale (RDKS).
To assess the scaling assumptions, reliability, and validity of the Simplified Diabetes Knowledge Scale (SDKS).
To compare the psychometric properties of the SDKS with the multiple-choice RDKS.

Main Methods:

Ninety-nine outpatients completed both the RDKS and the SDKS.
Response patterns and psychometric properties were analyzed.
Construct validity of the SDKS was tested.

Main Results:

Respondents scored 65% on the SDKS versus 62% on the RDKS.
The SDKS showed fewer missing responses, indicating easier completion.
The SDKS demonstrated favorable psychometric properties.

Conclusions:

The SDKS is a brief, simple diabetes knowledge questionnaire with good psychometric properties.
Further updates may be needed to incorporate additional diabetes education items.
The SDKS is planned for translation and validation in UK minority ethnic groups.