Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Nursing Clinical Information System

Nursing Clinical Information System

Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS)
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:

Purpose of Health Records I

Purpose of Health Records I

The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

At the different levels of the healthcare system, we see varying methods of healthcare used. These methods include managed care systems, case management, and primary healthcare.
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...

Health Literacy

Health Literacy

Health literacy is an individual's or a community's capacity to comprehend, receive, read, and use relevant healthcare information and services. The World Health Organization (WHO, 2018) defines health literacy as the cognitive and social skills that determine the ability of individuals to gain access to, understand, and use information in ways that promote and maintain good health. As a result, the WHO helps individuals manage long-term health concerns, participate in preventative programs,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Applying a complex systems-informed approach to population health interventions: a methodological case-study example of traffic restriction schemes outside schools.

BMC public health·2026

Same author

Does the provision of free medically tailored groceries high in fibre or healthy fats impact sodium and potassium intakes? Secondary data analysis of a randomised controlled trial with extended follow-up.

European journal of nutrition·2025

Same author

RNAi Strategies Against Downy Mildews: Insights Into dsRNA Uptake and Silencing.

Molecular plant pathology·2025

Same author

Slow synaptic plasticity from the hippocampus underlies gradual mapping and fragmentation of novel spaces by grid cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

Quantitative analysis of 'virtual' SSP assessment clinics in the NHS bowel cancer screening programme in England.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2025

Same author

A safety and feasibility randomized placebo controlled trial exploring electroencephalographic effective connectivity neurofeedback treatment for fibromyalgia.

Scientific reports·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Evaluating clinical librarian services: a systematic review.

Alison Brettle¹, Michelle Maden-Jenkins, Lucy Anderson

¹School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Salford, Salford. a.brettle@salford.ac.uk

Health Information and Libraries Journal

|February 15, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Clinical librarian (CL) services improve health professionals' time efficiency and clinical decision-making. This systematic review offers guidance for evaluating CL services and highlights their positive impact on healthcare.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Area of Science:

Health Sciences
Information Science
Medical Librarianship

Background:

Previous reviews noted limited evidence and poor quality evaluations of clinical librarian (CL) services.
A need exists for rigorous evaluations to demonstrate the value of CL services.
Guidance is required to achieve robust evaluations of CL services.

Purpose of the Study:

To systematically review models of CL services.
To examine the quality and methods used in evaluating CL services.
To explore perspectives on clinical librarian service evaluations.

Main Methods:

Systematic review methodology was employed.
Evidence synthesis was conducted collaboratively by a group of 8 librarians.
The review aimed to develop research and critical appraisal skills.

Main Results:

Four distinct models of clinical library service provision were identified.
CL services effectively save health professionals time and provide high-quality, relevant information.
CLs positively impact clinical decision-making, including diagnosis and treatment choices.
While study quality is improving, further work is needed to reduce bias and demonstrate patient care impact.
The Critical Incident Technique, within a mixed-methods approach, shows promise for impact demonstration.

Conclusions:

This review offers practical guidance for evaluating CL services.
Updated evidence supports the effectiveness and impact of CL services.
The collaborative review process successfully enhanced librarians' research and appraisal skills.