Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Reduction in Left Ventricular Wall Stress and Improvement in Function in Failing Hearts using Algisyl-LVR
Published on: April 8, 2013
Volume reduction rate by surgical ventricular restoration determines late outcome in ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Tadashi Isomura1, Joji Hoshino, Yasuhisa Fukada
1Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hayama Heart Center, Hayama, Japan.
Insights
Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) is most effective for ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) when it achieves a left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume index (ESVI) below 90 mL/m(2) with over 33% volume reduction. Achieving less than 15% reduction offers no long-term survival benefit.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) is a procedure to reduce left ventricular (LV) volume in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM).
- The importance of SVR has been questioned by the Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) Trial.
- Long-term outcomes of SVR in ICM patients require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report an 8-year experience with SVR in patients suffering from ICM.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of SVR based on the degree of LV volume reduction and its impact on long-term survival.
- To compare the findings with the results of the STICH trial.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 90 ICM patients who underwent SVR between 2000 and 2008.
- Pre- and post-operative assessment of LV volumes using left ventriculogram or scintigram, supplemented by echocardiograms.
- Categorization of patients based on post-operative LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI) and percentage of LV volume reduction.
Main Results:
- The study included 90 patients with ICM, with pre-operative LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI) of 123.5 ± 53.2 mL/m(2).
- Patients achieving >33% LV volume reduction and post-operative ESVI < 90 mL/m(2) (Group-S) had an 8-year survival rate of 82.4%.
- Patients with <15% LV volume reduction and residual ESVI >90 mL/m(2) (Group-M and Group-L) experienced 100% mortality within 7 years.
Conclusions:
- SVR is highly effective in ICM when it achieves a significant LV volume reduction (>33%) leading to an ESVI < 90 mL/m(2).
- SVR provides no long-term survival benefits if LV volume reduction is minimal (<15%) with a residual ESVI >90 mL/m(2).
- These findings contradict the conclusions of the STICH trial regarding the efficacy of SVR in ICM.
Aims:
Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) effectively reduces left ventricular (LV) volume in ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), but the recent Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) Trial questions its importance. We report 8-year SVR experience in patients with ICM.
Methods And Results:
Between 2000 and 2008, 135 patients underwent SVR for ICM. This report analyses data from 90 patients who underwent accurate pre- and post-operative assessment of LV volumes by left ventriculogram or scintigram. All patients also had echocardiograms. Pre-operative LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI) was 123.5 ± 53.2 mL/m(2) (range 92-310). Overall, 63 patients were in NHYA class III and 27 were in class IV. The SVR procedure was endoventricular circular patch plasty in 33 patients, septal-anterior ventricular exclusion in 43, and 14 patients had posterior exclusion. Coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 78 patients (87%) and 50 underwent mitral procedures. Eighteen follow-up late deaths occurred owing to chronic heart failure (n = 12) and sudden death (n = 6). Post-operative ESVI was < 90 mL/m(2) (Group-S) in 54 patients, 90-120 mL/m(2) (Group-M) in 16, and >120 mL/m(2) (Group-L) in 20 patients. The 8-year survival rate was 82.4% in group-S following a > 33% LV volume reduction. In contrast, in Group-M and Group-L, the volume reduction was ∼ 15%, and 100% of patients died within 7 years following the SVR procedure (or 0% 8-year survival).
Conclusions:
SVR is most effective when a >33% volume reduction rate achieves an ESVI of < 90 mL/m(2). No long-term benefits occur when SVR induces an LV volume reduction of < 15% leaving a residual ESVI >90 mL/m(2). This database contradicts the STICH trial findings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

