Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Creative Thinking01:25

Creative Thinking

Creative thinking encompasses innovative and unconventional methods for addressing challenges, often leading to groundbreaking solutions. Instead of focusing solely on enhancing existing systems, such as increasing smartphone battery capacity, creative thinking might inspire advancements like energy-efficient batteries or processors that minimize power consumption. This multidimensional approach underscores the importance of exploring novel pathways to innovation.
Divergent thinking is the...
Radical Reactivity: Overview01:11

Radical Reactivity: Overview

Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired molecule. These three...
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
Radical Reactivity: Steric Effects01:10

Radical Reactivity: Steric Effects

The presence of electron-donating, electron-withdrawing, or conjugating groups adjacent to a radical center, imparts electronic stabilization to the radicals. Examples of such electronically-stabilized radicals are triphenylmethyl, tetramethylpiperidine‐N‐oxide, and 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl. These radicals are remarkably stable and are known as persistent radicals. Some of the persistent radicals can even be isolated and purified.
Along with electronic factors, steric factors also account...
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Radical Reactivity: Concentration Effects01:20

Radical Reactivity: Concentration Effects

In a radical reaction, the concentration of starting materials governs the selectivity of a radical. For example, the reaction between an alkyl halide and an alkene, in the presence of tin hydride and AIBN, begins with the generation of a tin radical. The generated radical then abstracts halogen from the alkyl halide, producing an alkyl radical. This alkyl radical can either react with tin hydride, yielding an alkane, or add to an alkene, generating a nitrile-stabilized radical, eventually...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Working from home during COVID-19: A study of the interruption landscape.

The Journal of applied psychology·2021
Same author

Mitochondrial Dysfunction Causes Oxidative Stress and Tapetal Apoptosis in Chemical Hybridization Reagent-Induced Male Sterility in Wheat.

Frontiers in plant science·2018
Same author

Core-Shell ZIF-8@ZIF-67-Derived CoP Nanoparticle-Embedded N-Doped Carbon Nanotube Hollow Polyhedron for Efficient Overall Water Splitting.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2018
Same author

Collapsin response mediator protein 4 promotor methylation level as a potential predictor for diagnosing primary malignant lymphoma of the prostate.

Cancer cell international·2018
Same author

Efficient generation of functional haploid spermatids from human germline stem cells by three-dimensional-induced system.

Cell death and differentiation·2018
Same author

HSC extrinsic sex-related and intrinsic autoimmune disease-related human B-cell variation is recapitulated in humanized mice.

Blood advances·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance.

Nora Madjar1, Ellen Greenberg, Zheng Chen

  • 1Department of Management, University of Connecticut, 2100 Hillside Road, Unit 1041, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. nora.madjar@business.uconn.edu

The Journal of Applied Psychology
|February 16, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study differentiates radical and incremental creativity, identifying factors like risk-taking for radical creativity and coworker influence for incremental creativity. It also links conformity to routine performance.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Organizational Behavior
  • Creativity Studies
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Existing research often treats creativity monolithically.
  • Understanding distinct types of creativity and their drivers is crucial for innovation.
  • The role of social and personal factors in shaping creative versus routine work needs further exploration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between routine, radical, and incremental creativity.
  • To examine the interplay of social and personal factors influencing these performance types.
  • To provide theoretical and managerial insights into fostering different levels of creativity.

Main Methods:

  • The study likely employed a quantitative approach, possibly surveys or performance data analysis.
  • It differentiated performance into routine, radical, and incremental creativity.
  • Sensemaking perspective was used to analyze influencing factors.

Main Results:

  • Willingness to take risks, resources for creativity, and career commitment are linked to radical creativity.
  • Creative coworkers and organizational identification are associated with incremental creativity.
  • Conformity and organizational identification correlate with routine performance.

Conclusions:

  • Distinct factors drive radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine performance.
  • Organizational identification plays a dual role, influencing both incremental creativity and routine performance.
  • Managers can leverage these findings to cultivate specific types of employee performance.