Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing differences in country-level estimates of maternal mortality: a comparison of GMatH, UN, and GBD model results for 2020.

EClinicalMedicine·2025
Same author

Ecological diversity and metabolic strategies of widespread Marinisomatota in global oceans.

Marine life science & technology·2025
Same author

Global maternal health country typologies: A framework to guide policy.

PLOS global public health·2024
Same author

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Staffing Levels in Philadelphia Nursing Homes: Disparities Based on the Racial Composition of Geographical Areas.

Policy, politics & nursing practice·2024
Same author

Global maternal mortality projections by urban/rural location and education level: a simulation-based analysis.

EClinicalMedicine·2024
Same author

Pulsed Red and Blue Photobiomodulation for the Treatment of Thigh Contusions and Soft Tissue Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of sport rehabilitation·2023
Same journal

<i>Corrigendum to:</i> Identifying and Measuring Caregiver Burdens: A Scoping Review.

Population health management·2026
Same journal

When Administrative Requirements Shape Access: Medicaid Work Requirements and Mental Health Care.

Population health management·2026
Same journal

Screening for and Addressing Social Determinants of Health at Transitions of Care.

Population health management·2026
Same journal

When Sleep Hurts the Joints: Longitudinal Associations of Sleep Quality and Duration with Incident Arthritis in the English Longitudinal Study of Aging.

Population health management·2026
Same journal

It's Time to Build the Infrastructure that Makes Health Possible: Formalizing Accountable Communities for Health.

Population health management·2026
Same journal

Point-of-Care A1C and Time from Test to Communication of Results in Primary Care.

Population health management·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Avoiding randomization failure in program evaluation, with application to the Medicare Health Support program.

Gary King1, Richard Nielsen, Carter Coberley

  • 1Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. king@harvard.edu

Population Health Management
|February 18, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Randomized experiments are crucial for program evaluation, but errors in design and implementation can undermine results. This study identifies common pitfalls and offers solutions for more accurate large-scale program evaluations.

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Program Evaluation Methodology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Random assignment is fundamental to experimental design for program evaluation.
  • Real-world applications of random assignment often suffer from design, implementation, and analysis errors.
  • These errors can negate the benefits of randomization, impacting study validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and discuss common problems in applying random treatment assignment in large-scale program evaluations.
  • To highlight specific errors in design, implementation, and analysis that compromise randomized experiments.
  • To provide recommendations for improving the design and analysis of large-scale randomized experiments, using the Medicare Health Support evaluation as a case study.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of common errors in the application of random treatment assignment.
  • Examination of issues related to control of variability, randomization levels, treatment arm size, and statistical power.
  • Identification of problems leading to post-treatment bias.
  • Case study analysis of the Medicare Health Support evaluation to illustrate identified errors.

Main Results:

  • Numerous common errors were identified in the application of random assignment in large-scale program evaluations.
  • Specific issues include inadequate control of variability, inappropriate levels of randomization, insufficient treatment arm sizes, and low statistical power.
  • Post-treatment bias is a prevalent problem resulting from various implementation and analysis errors.
  • Serious errors were found in the Medicare Health Support evaluation, compromising its findings.

Conclusions:

  • Errors in the design, implementation, and analysis of random assignment frequently occur in large-scale program evaluations.
  • Addressing these common pitfalls is essential to fully leverage the advantages of randomization.
  • Recommendations are provided to enhance the rigor and validity of future large-scale randomized experiments.