Comparing sleep measures of infants derived from parental reports in sleep diaries and acceleration sensors

Yoko Asaka1, Satoshi Takada

  • 1Konan Women's University, Faculty of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. asaka@konan-wu.ac.jp

Insights

Infant sleep diaries accurately capture sleep schedules, while actigraphs better assess sleep quality and stability. This comparison guides clinical use for infant sleep research.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Sleep Medicine
  • Biomedical Data Collection
  • Infant Development

Background:

  • Accurate infant sleep measurement is crucial for development and health.
  • Comparing objective (actigraphy) and subjective (sleep diaries) methods is essential for validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare infant sleep measures from actigraphy and sleep diaries.
  • To determine the clinical utility of each data collection method for infant sleep.

Main Methods:

  • 52 infants and mothers participated over 7 days.
  • Sleep data collected via actigraphy (Micro-mini RC) and daily sleep diaries.
  • Analysis focused on concordance between the two methods.

Main Results:

  • High concordance for sleep onset/offset times (r=0.91-0.89).
  • Moderate concordance for nocturnal sleep duration (r=0.75).
  • Lower concordance for night wakings and Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) (r=0.46, r=0.34).
  • Sleep diary accuracy varied with sleeping location and time.

Conclusions:

  • Sleep diaries effectively capture infant sleep schedules.
  • Actigraphy is recommended for detailed sleep quality and stability assessment.
  • Method choice depends on clinical focus: daily rhythms vs. objective sleep parameters.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos