Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Treatment Model for Young Patients with Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction and Resultant Infertility
Published on: May 30, 2025
A feasibility study comparing pharmacist and physician recommendations for sildenafil treatment
Tara Symonds1, John D Dean, Alison Carr
1Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA. tara.symonds@pfizer.com
Introduction:
In Europe, pharmacists may be an important first point of contact for men with erectile dysfunction (ED) asking for advice and treatment.
Aim:
To determine if European community pharmacists could appropriately recommend suitability for supply of sildenafil 50 mg for the treatment of ED.
Methods:
For this cross-sectional, observational study, the current Summary of Product Characteristics was adapted to create a study drug information sheet for use in a pharmacy setting in which, for certain patients, supply is not suitable and referral to a physician is recommended. After training and with use of a guidance questionnaire, pharmacists assessed the suitability of supply of sildenafil 50 mg for men presenting to their pharmacy. Men with self-reported ED who were not currently using a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor were recruited. Within 7 days of the pharmacist-patient interaction, a physician with experience in the management of ED telephoned the subject to assess suitability. If there was discordance between the pharmacist and physician recommendations, the case was independently reassessed by a physician specialist in sexual medicine.
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary end point was the concordance rate (with 95% confidence intervals) between pharmacist and physician recommendations. Rates were weighted by country sample sizes.
Results:
Concordance (95% confidence interval) was 0.70 (0.66-0.74) between pharmacist and physician recommendation, indicating agreement in 70% of cases, and was 0.90 (0.86-0.94) between pharmacist and physician specialist in sexual medicine. Furthermore, if the cases in which the pharmacist did not put subjects at risk (i.e., gave an acceptable recommendation) are assessed, the success rate is 83.5% (79.6-87.4%) and 92.8% (90.1-95.5%), respectively.
Conclusion:
Pharmacists were accurate in providing suitable treatment recommendation, generally not recommending sildenafil for men without ED and recommending physician assessment when there was any question about cardiovascular health, other comorbidity, or co-medication.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors
Among the PDE5 inhibitors, sildenafil (Revatio) stands out as a competitive and selective inhibitor. It operates by elevating cellular levels of cGMP and augmenting signaling through the cGMP-PKG pathway, promoting vasodilation. Upon oral...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence