Propidium monoazide combined with real-time quantitative PCR underestimates heat-killed Listeria innocua

Trond Løvdal1, Maria Befring Hovda, Benny Björkblom

  • 1Nofima Norconserv AS, Stavanger, Norway. trond.lovdal@nofima.no

Insights

Propidium monoazide quantitative PCR (PMA-qPCR) overestimated viable Listeria innocua. Researchers advise caution when using PMA-qPCR to distinguish live from dead bacteria.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Accurate differentiation between viable and dead bacteria is crucial in food safety and clinical diagnostics.
  • Quantitative PCR (qPCR) combined with propidium monoazide (PMA) is a common method for this differentiation.
  • However, the reliability of PMA-qPCR needs validation against established methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of propidium monoazide quantitative PCR (PMA-qPCR) for determining viable Listeria innocua.
  • To compare PMA-qPCR results with traditional plate counts and confocal fluorescence microscopy.

Main Methods:

  • Bacterial samples of Listeria innocua were treated with PMA.
  • DNA was extracted and amplified using qPCR.
  • Results were compared with those obtained from standard plate counts and confocal fluorescence microscopy.

Main Results:

  • PMA-qPCR significantly overestimated the proportion of viable Listeria innocua cells.
  • Discrepancies were noted when compared to both plate counts and confocal fluorescence microscopy.
  • This suggests potential inaccuracies in PMA's ability to differentiate live and dead cells in this context.

Conclusions:

  • The combination of PMA and qPCR may not reliably distinguish between viable and dead Listeria innocua.
  • Caution is advised when employing PMA-qPCR as a sole analytical tool for viability assessment.
  • Further research is needed to optimize or validate PMA-qPCR for bacterial viability studies.