Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Biotinylated Cell-penetrating Peptides to Study Intracellular Protein-protein Interactions
Published on: December 20, 2017
Ionizing radiation-induced TAp63α phosphorylation at C-terminal S/TQ motifs requires the N-terminal transactivation
Dal-Ah Kim1, Byong-Linne Lee, Eun-Kyung Suh
1Department of Life Science, College of Natural Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract:
TAp63α, a homolog of p53 and one of six alternatively spliced p63 isoforms, is a critical mediator of the ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DNA damage response in female germ cells and also tumor suppression in somatic cells. The ΔNp63α isoform, lacking the N-terminal transactivation (TA) domain, is associated with oncogenic potential. The mechanism of p63 functional regulation is not well understood. TAp63α is phosphorylated by ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DNA damage and gene transactivation is likely to be involved. Based on information gleaned from studies on p53, we explored the possibility that TAp63α S/TQ sites may be phosphorylated by IR-induced DNA damage. Our findings show a wortmanin-sensitive kinase phosphorylates TAp63α at C-terminal Ser-Gln and Thr-Gln (S/TQ) sites but not N-terminal S/TQ sites. ΔNp63α, lacking the TA domain, and TAp63γ, lacking C-terminal domains, including S/TQ sites, fail to undergo IR-induced phosphorylation. We propose a model for TA domain-dependent C-terminal phosphorylation drawing from previously described self-inactivating intramolecular interaction between N-terminal TA domain and C-terminal Transactivation Inhibitory Domain (TID) of TAp63α. A specific topology adopted only by TAp63α, but not possible for ΔNp63α or TAp63γ, may lead to TAp63α-specific kinase recruitment, phosphorylation and self-inactivation release. TID-lacking TAp63γ, like p53, is constitutively active and thus may forgo phosphorylation-dependent activation. Thus, p53 is regulated by protein stabilization and TAp63α by protein activation but both appear to involve S/TQ phosphorylation. The difference in phosphorylation potential of TAp63α and ΔNp63α may in part help explain why the two similar isoforms have diametrically opposite tumor suppression and oncogene functions, respectively.
Insights
Ionizing radiation (IR) triggers phosphorylation of TAp63α at C-terminal sites, a process dependent on its transactivation domain. This IR-induced phosphorylation differs from p53 regulation and may explain TAp63α
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular Biology
- Cancer Research
Background:
- TAp63α, a p53 homolog, mediates DNA damage response and tumor suppression.
- The ΔNp63α isoform, lacking the transactivation domain, is linked to oncogenesis.
- Mechanisms of p63 isoform regulation, particularly phosphorylation, remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the phosphorylation of TAp63α in response to ionizing radiation (IR).
- To elucidate the role of specific domains in IR-induced TAp63α phosphorylation.
- To understand how phosphorylation differences between p63 isoforms contribute to their distinct functions.
Main Methods:
- Exploration of TAp63α Serine/Threonine-Glutamine (S/TQ) sites for IR-induced phosphorylation.
- Assessment of phosphorylation in response to wortmanin, a kinase inhibitor.
- Comparative analysis of IR-induced phosphorylation in TAp63α, ΔNp63α, and TAp63γ isoforms.
Main Results:
- A wortmanin-sensitive kinase phosphorylates TAp63α at C-terminal S/TQ sites following IR.
- N-terminal S/TQ sites and isoforms lacking the transactivation domain (ΔNp63α) or C-terminal domains (TAp63γ) do not undergo IR-induced phosphorylation.
- A model is proposed where the TAp63α transactivation domain facilitates C-terminal phosphorylation and self-inactivation release.
Conclusions:
- TAp63α activation is regulated by IR-induced C-terminal phosphorylation, dependent on its transactivation domain.
- This phosphorylation mechanism differs from p53 regulation, which involves protein stabilization.
- Differential phosphorylation potential between TAp63α and ΔNp63α likely underlies their opposing roles in tumor suppression and oncogenesis.
Related Concept Videos
Tail-anchoring of Proteins in the ER Membrane
TGF - β Signaling Pathway
Receptor Tyrosine Kinases
MAPK Signaling Cascades
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway
Eukaryotic Transcription Activators
The binding domains are capable of recognizing and interacting with regulatory sequences on the DNA. These domains are...

