Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stimulus miscuing and dishabituation: electrodermal activity and resource allocation.

D A Siddle1, D Broekhuizen, J S Packer

  • 1School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia.

Biological Psychology
|December 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effects of change in lead stimulus modality on the modulation of acoustic blink startle.

Psychophysiology·2000
Same author

Pain relief using smart technology: an overview of a new patient-controlled analgesia device.

IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2000
Same author

The effect of warning stimulus modality on blink startle modification in reaction time tasks.

Psychophysiology·2000
Same author

Smart technology improves patient-controlled analgesia: a preliminary report.

Anesthesia and analgesia·1999
Same author

The effects of threat and nonthreat word lead stimuli on blink modification.

Psychophysiology·1999
Same author

Effects of stimulus modality and task condition on blink startle modification and on electrodermal responses.

Psychophysiology·1998
Same journal

Afterword to the Biological Psychology Special Issue:Contributions of the Vagus to Psychological Functioning and Health:Reflections upon genuine relations between vagus-nerve functioning and psychological processes.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Characterizing Individual Differences in SCR Responsivity: A Hybrid Mixture and Single-Trial Modeling Framework.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Your Heart Beats Next To Mine: Daily Physiological Synchrony Among Black And White ADRD Caregiver-Care Recipient Dyads.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Stimulus arousal level and savoring:an electrocortical investigation.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Neural response to reward and pathological personality dimensions.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Early automatic and late lateralised top-down mechanisms for 3D perception.

Biological psychology·2026
See all related articles

Miscuing a shock stimulus (S2) by presenting it unexpectedly increased electrodermal responses and processing resources. This miscuing also led to subsequent dishabituation, impacting associative learning.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human Physiology

Background:

  • Dishabituation is a phenomenon where a change in stimulus leads to renewed responding.
  • Skin conductance response (SCR) is a physiological measure of emotional arousal.
  • Processing resources refer to the cognitive capacity allocated to stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of miscuing a shock stimulus on skin conductance response dishabituation.
  • To examine how miscuing affects the allocation of processing resources.
  • To explore the role of stimulus expectancy in these processes.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted with control and experimental groups.
  • Experiment 1 measured skin conductance response to a shock stimulus (S2) that was either clearly discernible or uncomfortable.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2 used reaction time to a probe stimulus to assess processing resources.

    • Main Results:

    • Miscuing S2 by presenting it after S3 increased electrodermal responding and led to subsequent dishabituation.
    • Miscuing reduced the expectancy of S2 following S1.
    • Reaction time data indicated increased processing resources allocated to S2 after miscuing.

    Conclusions:

    • Miscuing a shock stimulus enhances electrodermal responding and dishabituation.
    • Unexpected stimulus presentation increases the allocation of processing resources.
    • Findings contribute to understanding associative learning and attentional mechanisms.