Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

[Breast reconstruction after mastectomy].

Christophe Lepage1, Laurent Lantieri

  • 1docteurlepage@gmail.com

La Revue Du Praticien
|February 19, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microscope-integrated augmented reality for lymphaticovenous anastomosis: Improving identification, reproducibility, and efficiency control.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

Acellular Dermal Substitutes for Lining the Exenterated Orbit-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Patient-Specific Simulation and 3D‑Printed Intraoperative Guide in Hybrid Preservation Rhinoplasty: Enhancing Reproducibility, Communication, and Outcomes.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Medical management of acute partial skin necrosis following nipple-sparing mastectomy using an M101-based oxygenating dressing: Two case reports.

JPRAS open·2026
Same author

A New Method for Preparation of Decellularized Human Scaffolds for Facial Reconstruction.

Current issues in molecular biology·2025
Same author

Hydrogel Containing an Oxygen Carrier With Hemoglobin From the Marine Worm <i>Arenicola marina</i> (M101) in the Management of Deep Burns.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2025

Breast reconstruction now utilizes the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap technique, using a patient's own tissues for natural, long-lasting results without donor site morbidity. This advanced plastic surgery method offers definitive breast reconstruction.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Oncology
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Context:

  • Breast reconstruction is a crucial component of breast cancer treatment.
  • Traditional methods often involve implants, which may have limitations.
  • Advancements in plastic surgery offer alternatives using the patient's own tissues.

Purpose:

  • To inform medical practitioners about advanced breast reconstruction techniques.
  • To highlight the benefits of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap procedure.
  • To encourage referrals to specialized surgeons for autologous breast reconstruction.

Summary:

  • The Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap technique allows for breast reconstruction using the patient's own tissues.
  • This method avoids morbidity at the donor site, resulting in a natural, durable, and evolving breast.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

  • Unlike implant-based reconstruction, DIEP flaps typically do not require reintervention.

    • Impact:

    • Enhances patient outcomes in breast cancer treatment through natural and long-lasting reconstruction.
    • Reduces the need for revision surgeries associated with traditional implant methods.
    • Empowers surgeons to offer more sophisticated and patient-centered reconstructive options.