Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Should reference beam data be used for beam modeling during linear accelerator commissioning?

Medical physics·2026
Same author

Pulse‑level characterization of low monitor unit deliveries on a modern linear accelerator using a plastic scintillation detector.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same author

In Regard to Das et al.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same author

Quantitative phantom-based comparison of commercial CT metal artifact reduction algorithms.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same author

Drowning prevention knowledge and risk behaviors among children and adolescents in China: a cross-sectional study.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Advancing radiation oncology care in Ukraine during the war: impact of international observerships on professional development and clinical practice.

Frontiers in oncology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

A quality assurance method with submillimeter accuracy for stereotactic linear accelerators.

Jimm Grimm1, Shu-Ya Lisa Grimm, Indra J Das

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA. Grimm-Jimm@CooperHealth.edu

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|February 19, 2011
PubMed
Summary

The Stereotactic Alignment for Linear Accelerator (S.A. Linac) system enhances linac alignment accuracy. It achieves submillimeter precision for stereotactic radiotherapy, improving patient safety and treatment efficacy.

More Related Videos

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments
06:08

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments

Published on: May 26, 2019

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
10:35

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Published on: April 17, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments
06:08

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments

Published on: May 26, 2019

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
10:35

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Published on: April 17, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Radiotherapy Technology

Background:

  • Conventional linear accelerators (linacs) require precise alignment for stereotactic radiotherapy.
  • Existing alignment methods can be time-consuming and may lack the necessary precision for submillimeter accuracy.
  • Stereotactic cones are used with linacs to deliver highly focused radiation beams.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate the Stereotactic Alignment for Linear Accelerator (S.A. Linac) system.
  • To improve the alignment accuracy of conventional linacs equipped with stereotactic cones.
  • To achieve submillimeter end-to-end accuracy in radiotherapy delivery.

Main Methods:

  • The S.A. Linac system utilizes the Winston-Lutz test for quality assurance.
  • It performs 3D reconstruction of the quality assurance (QA) ball coordinates relative to the radiation isocenter.
  • The system integrates digital images of laser targets to determine room laser positions, providing real-time feedback via a handheld device.

Main Results:

  • Median 3D QA ball alignment error was 0.09 mm, with 97% of errors ≤ 0.25 mm.
  • All 3D isocentric errors were 0.3 mm or less.
  • Median x and y laser alignment coordinate error was 0.09 mm, with 94% of errors ≤ 0.25 mm.

Conclusions:

  • The S.A. Linac system significantly enhances the alignment accuracy of conventional linacs for stereotactic radiotherapy.
  • The system enables submillimeter end-to-end accuracy, effectively transforming conventional linacs into 'Submillimeter Knives'.
  • This advancement has the potential to improve the safety and efficacy of precision radiation treatments.